Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

This is a silly rule. Why should a tip cancel PI? You can catch a tipped pass for a TD or you can intercept a tipped pass. Someone school me on why a tip cancels PI.

Tips cancel PI because as a defender, you time your contest when the ball gets to the receiver. 
 

If the ball is tipped, the defender would end up hitting the receiver early, since tips normally slow the ball down. 

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

ACC could get weird.  If Clemson and UNC win out…..could a one loss ACC Champ get in beating what likely would be a top 10ish team in the conference title?   1 loss ACC Champ teams have gotten in several years to the CFP. 
 

@LinvilleGorge guess you got to pull for Clemson the next couple weeks lol

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

If we manage to get to the ACC CG with one loss then I'll start really paying attention to the playoffs picture. I bet these SEC dick riders will put a Tennessee team that doesn't even make the SEC CG in over a one loss ACC champ though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

True.  Same for Clemson.  But I guess that is what you got to pull for if you are UNC or Clemson fan.  Not that I want to see it given the Tigers got no business playing one of those teams this year.  
 

I’m sure the committee would just prefer one of the 2 teams lose prior so that ACC title win doesn’t look good on paper.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

True.  Same for Clemson.  But I guess that is what you got to pull for if you are UNC or Clemson fan.  Not that I want to see it given the Tigers got business playing one of those teams this year.  
 

I’m sure the committee would just prefer one of the 2 teams lose prior so that ACC title win doesn’t look good on paper.  

The nightmare for the rest of the country is an undefeated UGA team losing the SEC CG. The SEC champ is going. UGA would go. They're gonna be lobbying HARD for a one loss Tennessee team. You could legit be looking at 3 SEC teams and OSU/Michigan.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

If we manage to get to the ACC CG with one loss then I'll start really paying attention to the playoffs picture. I bet these SEC dick riders will put a Tennessee team that doesn't even make the SEC CG in over a one loss ACC champ though.

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

You shouldn't be able to get a bye week into a four team playoff. If you can't qualify for a conference championship game you should be out, period. And yes, ND should simply be out period by default.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

Not arguing that.  

Committee has some precedents they have set before on how they evaluate and reward teams though….and they to an extent have to think about the years past and ahead. 

that’s why I think they would prefer life be easy on them and those other teams lose a game to weaken that conference title. Let’s say Clemson wins out.  UNC wins out beating another ranked team.  Then gets a conference title over a top 10ish team.  

You got a power 5 conference champ in UNC with one loss…..getting left out in favor of 2 one loss teams with no conference champ.  Committee would hate to have to go there lol.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Don't forget about sneaky Oregon lurking.

I’m going to root for the cluster fug and the CFB to deal with this 

Big 10 Champ IN

SEC Champ IN

2 1 loss SEC teams, 1 loss ACC champ, 1 loss PAC 12 champ, 1 loss Big 12 champ 

Eyeball test vs conference champ drawn in the sand.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...