Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

This is a silly rule. Why should a tip cancel PI? You can catch a tipped pass for a TD or you can intercept a tipped pass. Someone school me on why a tip cancels PI.

Tips cancel PI because as a defender, you time your contest when the ball gets to the receiver. 
 

If the ball is tipped, the defender would end up hitting the receiver early, since tips normally slow the ball down. 

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

ACC could get weird.  If Clemson and UNC win out…..could a one loss ACC Champ get in beating what likely would be a top 10ish team in the conference title?   1 loss ACC Champ teams have gotten in several years to the CFP. 
 

@LinvilleGorge guess you got to pull for Clemson the next couple weeks lol

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

If we manage to get to the ACC CG with one loss then I'll start really paying attention to the playoffs picture. I bet these SEC dick riders will put a Tennessee team that doesn't even make the SEC CG in over a one loss ACC champ though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

True.  Same for Clemson.  But I guess that is what you got to pull for if you are UNC or Clemson fan.  Not that I want to see it given the Tigers got no business playing one of those teams this year.  
 

I’m sure the committee would just prefer one of the 2 teams lose prior so that ACC title win doesn’t look good on paper.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

True.  Same for Clemson.  But I guess that is what you got to pull for if you are UNC or Clemson fan.  Not that I want to see it given the Tigers got business playing one of those teams this year.  
 

I’m sure the committee would just prefer one of the 2 teams lose prior so that ACC title win doesn’t look good on paper.  

The nightmare for the rest of the country is an undefeated UGA team losing the SEC CG. The SEC champ is going. UGA would go. They're gonna be lobbying HARD for a one loss Tennessee team. You could legit be looking at 3 SEC teams and OSU/Michigan.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, we still gotta win three more games to even be in the conversation. That ain't no guarantee. 😂

If we manage to get to the ACC CG with one loss then I'll start really paying attention to the playoffs picture. I bet these SEC dick riders will put a Tennessee team that doesn't even make the SEC CG in over a one loss ACC champ though.

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

You shouldn't be able to get a bye week into a four team playoff. If you can't qualify for a conference championship game you should be out, period. And yes, ND should simply be out period by default.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think they would too and the results may support it.  The ACC isn't great by any means this year. 

I think Alabama, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee would all beat the best ACC team.  I think Florida would give the best ACC team fits....

Not arguing that.  

Committee has some precedents they have set before on how they evaluate and reward teams though….and they to an extent have to think about the years past and ahead. 

that’s why I think they would prefer life be easy on them and those other teams lose a game to weaken that conference title. Let’s say Clemson wins out.  UNC wins out beating another ranked team.  Then gets a conference title over a top 10ish team.  

You got a power 5 conference champ in UNC with one loss…..getting left out in favor of 2 one loss teams with no conference champ.  Committee would hate to have to go there lol.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Don't forget about sneaky Oregon lurking.

I’m going to root for the cluster fug and the CFB to deal with this 

Big 10 Champ IN

SEC Champ IN

2 1 loss SEC teams, 1 loss ACC champ, 1 loss PAC 12 champ, 1 loss Big 12 champ 

Eyeball test vs conference champ drawn in the sand.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...