Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So you think Mills is the better prospect? I just want to confirm that’s what you are saying…

Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if the Texans draft a new QB with their projected top pick right now.

I think Mills has out performed him and yes the Texans will draft a QB, he’s a second round pick with zero expectations and a low ceiling. And Fields was a second round pick the bears would be contemplating also.

 

Don’t know why you have such a hard on for a below average QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

RUSHING YARDS DONT COUNT BECAUSE.... THEY JUST DONT OK????

spacer.png

If rushing yards are half your production as a QB you'll never win a Superbowl. 

The goal is to find a Championship caliber QB.

Not a highlight reel that looks good on Madden. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I explained it to you.

Running is the icing not the cake.

Running was a fraction of the game of Steve Young, Russell Wilson, Patrick Mahomes, Roger Staubach.

You can't win a Superbowl if half your game is your ability to run.

You aren't Running 80 yards in less than 2 minutes with 1 timeout.

You have to be able to distribute the football. 

I bet you prefer Allen Iverson over Magic and Stockton.

 

So if a random QB, let’s call him Fustin Jields, THROWS 3 TDs and RUNs for 1 TD, then that would be good right? 
 

Jordan and Kobe over Magic and Stockton. How many rings did Stockton get?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

So if a random QB, let’s call him Fustin Jields, THROWS 3 TDs and RUNs for 1 TD, then that would be good right? 
 

Jordan and Kobe over Magic and Stockton. How many rings did Stockton get?? 

If he runs for 170 and only passes for 170 yes that's bad.

If he runs for 170 and only passes for 209 that's bad.

Long term success would be throw for 330 and run for 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

That’s a lie, Fields just today finally has more TD than ints, Both Mills and Lawrence have more than 1000 more yards than him passing 


Fields entered today with 7 TDs and 6 Ints. Threw 3 TDs. Now it’s 10-6. Which one of us is lying? Mills is 10-8 with 456 more yards in 100 more attempts. Lawrence is 11-6 with 900 more yards in 150 more attempts. 

Now. Would you care to explain which one of us is lying here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I think Mills has out performed him and yes the Texans will draft a QB, he’s a second round pick with zero expectations and a low ceiling. And Fields was a second round pick the bears would be contemplating also.

 

Don’t know why you have such a hard on for a below average QB

Outperformed him by leading his franchise to a top pick? Outperformed him with less total yards? What are you using as a measurement for “outperforming.” 
Also Mills was a 3rd round pick…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catsfan has already explained his position on this before

he will inevitably go back, list out super bowl winning QBs, and try to make the argument that mobile QBs don’t win Super Bowls 

his list will hilariously omit any mobile QB that has ever won a super bowl under the justification that “if they won a super bowl, they must not be a mobile QB.”

you’re either a mobile QB, or when you win a super bowl, you no longer are classified as one, forever preserving his dumb premise that mobile QBs don’t win Super Bowls 

just ignore him

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

Catsfan has already explained his position on this before

he will inevitably go back, list out super bowl winning QBs, and try to make the argument that mobile QBs don’t win Super Bowls 

his list will hilariously omit any mobile QB that has ever won a super bowl under the justification that “if they won a super bowl, they just not be a mobile QB.”

you’re either a mobile QB, or when you win a super bowl, you no longer are one, forever preserving his dumb premise that mobile QBs don’t win Super Bowls 

just ignore him

Mobile QBs do.

Dual threat don't 

I can list tons of mobile qbs in history that have won. Mobile QB is where the sweet spot is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:


Fields entered today with 7 TDs and 6 Ints. Threw 3 TDs. Now it’s 10-6. Which one of us is lying? Mills is 10-8 with 456 more yards in 100 more attempts. Lawrence is 11-6 with 900 more yards in 150 more attempts. 

Now. Would you care to explain which one of us is lying here? 

I was talking about career stats……

this is why you don’t interject into conversation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...