Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Mocks/Simulations Here!


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

/cdn-cgi/mirage/fca5f8343d5e151eec9f086213a99e9631041342c38fd104d3f1df356d4f8a92/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2023_02/image.png.2d2b3d10442a3e3b450d162c7c1958ed.png

I would have liked to address Edge sooner but the value wasn't there.  I am a proponent of continually building the O-line.   Most importantly Stroud fell to our lap without trading up. 

Tillman would be a steal that late. He was Tennessee’s 1 before he got injured. Who is Avila going to replace?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screenshot_20230219-101531_Chrome.thumb.jpg.0c80ea2ff1188fb635703be0ab56d7fa.jpg20230219_140643.thumb.jpg.5622df5ad5680e84f9856a6b1549f2fe.jpg

Top 4 QB's were gone, it was a no brainer to grab Carter. Finished the Dline with Ika. Carter, Ika, Brown would be a very formidable Dline for a 3-4 defense. Jones has the skills needed to be very good in zone coverage and adequate in man. Mayer and Bigsby are potential studs on offense. Wicks is very talented if this really good coaching staff can get it out of him. Haener is probably cheaper depth, but I also like his potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

here is an excellent trade down draft

image.thumb.png.e9ec3a9d21bb143c50b2546d7fe3f3a2.png

I think that would be the ultimate hatchet-burying move for this board.  We get a QB, didn't have to move up, actually moved back to get more picks.  I'd be ok with AR if we moved back, just not at #9.  We need more picks this year and we may have a QB more polished sitting there next year within striking distance to move up.  Drafting AR, as completely as raw as he, does not preclude us drafting another next year if a franchise QB can be had.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think that would be the ultimate hatchet-burying move for this board.  We get a QB, didn't have to move up, actually moved back to get more picks.  I'd be ok with AR if we moved back, just not at #9.  We need more picks this year and we may have a QB more polished sitting there next year within striking distance to move up.  Drafting AR, as completely as raw as he, does not preclude us drafting another next year if a franchise QB can be had.

totally agree on your point about not precluding us from taking a QB next year

No matter who we draft this year, if we're bad enough to be in the top 3 next year I'm taking Maye or Williams and figuring the rest out later

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...