Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Mocks/Simulations Here!


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

/cdn-cgi/mirage/fca5f8343d5e151eec9f086213a99e9631041342c38fd104d3f1df356d4f8a92/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2023_02/image.png.2d2b3d10442a3e3b450d162c7c1958ed.png

I would have liked to address Edge sooner but the value wasn't there.  I am a proponent of continually building the O-line.   Most importantly Stroud fell to our lap without trading up. 

Tillman would be a steal that late. He was Tennessee’s 1 before he got injured. Who is Avila going to replace?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screenshot_20230219-101531_Chrome.thumb.jpg.0c80ea2ff1188fb635703be0ab56d7fa.jpg20230219_140643.thumb.jpg.5622df5ad5680e84f9856a6b1549f2fe.jpg

Top 4 QB's were gone, it was a no brainer to grab Carter. Finished the Dline with Ika. Carter, Ika, Brown would be a very formidable Dline for a 3-4 defense. Jones has the skills needed to be very good in zone coverage and adequate in man. Mayer and Bigsby are potential studs on offense. Wicks is very talented if this really good coaching staff can get it out of him. Haener is probably cheaper depth, but I also like his potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

here is an excellent trade down draft

image.thumb.png.e9ec3a9d21bb143c50b2546d7fe3f3a2.png

I think that would be the ultimate hatchet-burying move for this board.  We get a QB, didn't have to move up, actually moved back to get more picks.  I'd be ok with AR if we moved back, just not at #9.  We need more picks this year and we may have a QB more polished sitting there next year within striking distance to move up.  Drafting AR, as completely as raw as he, does not preclude us drafting another next year if a franchise QB can be had.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think that would be the ultimate hatchet-burying move for this board.  We get a QB, didn't have to move up, actually moved back to get more picks.  I'd be ok with AR if we moved back, just not at #9.  We need more picks this year and we may have a QB more polished sitting there next year within striking distance to move up.  Drafting AR, as completely as raw as he, does not preclude us drafting another next year if a franchise QB can be had.

totally agree on your point about not precluding us from taking a QB next year

No matter who we draft this year, if we're bad enough to be in the top 3 next year I'm taking Maye or Williams and figuring the rest out later

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young? He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 
    • Initially, I wanted Stroud but I thought the trade up meant that, whoever they chose, it was for a reason.  There was no pressure to do anything for the entire scouting team to do other than investigate every aspect of the top 3 candidates.  Stroud had his question marks, and I think it is possible that he falters this year.  Bryce had a much worse situation here in Carolina because we neglected the OL, traded our #1 WR, did not pick WRs well in the draft, traded our pro bowl RB, and seem to disregard the TE position altogether.  Bozeman was not a good fit and we relied on an improved OL in 2022 to suggest that we were set there when we were far from it.  Fitterer had no vision, no grasp of talent, and everyone in the front office and on the coaching staff were pretending to be gurus.  Our coaching staff was a group of men earning a lifetime achievement paycheck.  It all goes back to the years of neglect for the OL.  My theory?  If Stroud had come to Carolina, he would be as mocked and ridiculed as Bryce Young.   No, he does not have a cannon.  Chad Pennington was a weak-armed QB who had success and would have been even better if it were not for injuries.  Smarts is important at QB, and so are mechanics.  Before you can address Young's mechanics, he needs an OL, Running game, and weapons. We were not really able to run play action from under center for a few reasons--play action is not effective when you have to pass the ball--other than that, the QB must turn his back to the LOS for about 1.5 seconds.  When the QB has less than 2.5 seconds to pass the ball, that eliminates that part of the play book.  Heck, even the run option is minimized when there is immediate facial pressure.  SO those who want to talk about happy feet, bouncing, etc--they are symptoms of the problem, not the problem.  A weak arm?  Well, Young's arm is between Chad Pennington and Joe Montana--closer to Joe.  His are is not as weak as some think--but he has issues with the deep ball. When you are reacting to the defense and quickly have to pass, then that takes away the strength because you don't have the base to get power behind it.  I still wish we had taken Stroud, but we have Young and if you toss him out before giving him support, you are not wise, unsmart, not unfoolish, and rather elite in your failure to attain mediocrity.  Expect growth.  How much? Nobody knows.
×
×
  • Create New...