Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We currently have the #2 pick in the draft :)


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Corral is better 

In fairness, I don't know if he is or isn't better but what I do know is that he'll compete for the starting job.  I don't give a rats @SS if that QB is the #1 pick.  He's not going to be given the keys without earning it. 

Anyone that believes that the head coach is going to give the rookie QB the starting job without working for it, is insane.   To the chagrin of our Tanker counterparts that believe a drafted QB has the job and it's his to lose, they are wrong.   He may be given every opportunity to win it, but Corral is going to be out there showing he is as good if not better.

T

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Most will also agree several talking heads had him as the best QB in the draft and his stock dropped over some BS off the field statements.  

I have no issues with drafting a QB but I can guarantee you that Corral will be in the conversation with our prospective head coach.  

You love riding the injury and lower draft status as if it is your only justification.  Many of Corral's traits transition to the NFL quite well.  Especially decision making and quick release.  He had, by far, the quickest release of any QB in recent drafts including this one. 

Here's the way I see it.  

Trade down and get a 1st this year and next.  Pick a QB, whoever it may be with the lower pick.  Let that QB and Corral compete.  If they both bomb you have 2 first round picks to move up and get a Franchise QB like Maye.   And you don't have to tank to do it. 

We keep going around in circles yes I believe teams tell the truth when they use draft capital especially on the QB position. And losing an entire season being a project/system QB puts him right behind the 8 ball. Sure I believe he will be on the roster but if we draft a bloke high it will take minor miracle for him to win the job 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Weak argument, bro.  I haven't seen one thing Stroud does great, alot of nice things and some bad things.  Young, as I said earlier, his height worries me.  I remember RGIII.  Fortunately for the Redskins they drafted Cousins.  Oh yeah, late in the same draft. 

Based on? Quick Release, accuracy, mobility, leadership? Or maybe it is just a freak accident with an O-Line that couldn't protect our children (on the field), as you proof they are better.  The only thing you truly have is all these talking heads thinks he's ready.  

Oh that's right, Corral comes from a Pistol offense where he doesn't go under center.  Stroud and Young are different because they are thoroughbreds for Alabama and OSU. 

Weak argument?? Lol 

You want to have a debate about a 3round QB who hasn’t played a down in the NFL.. Or base our draft Strategy on that QB.. lol 

no weak fuging opinion..

years of  production .. That’s the difference check their numbers in college compared to his and keep acting like you don’t see the difference.,

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Jamarcus Russel won the national championship with LSU and is considered the biggest bust in NFL history.   His college production was amazing.  David Carr had an amazing college career and bombed out.  Do I need to go on with how great of college production means in the NFL?

Fields is 3-8 in his 2nd year.  He loves to run, one day that is going to get him destroyed.  How does that make him a better prospect.  

This is a consistent argument for the Tanker crew.  They are blah blah blah better than anyone from last year.  Alabama is having one of their worst seasons and most likely will miss the playoffs, I guess Young is the scapegoat.  He gets all the praise when he wins, why not the losses. 

This is dumb and way to long and has nothing to do with the underline problem with your opinion..

1. Situation and context is void in your analogy., 

example .. Nobody questioned Russell talent.. Russell didn’t fail because he wasn’t talented he failed because he didn’t want to work on his craft ate to much and decided to not look at film.. Talent and desire to play football are 2 different things..

but again I don’t want to go down the rabbit hole of ppl with your narratives or the not drafting a QB community..  It’s been 4 years of QB band aids and bad QB play.. I’m done with the BS.. Time to change up strategies.. good night 

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Weak argument?? Lol 

You want to have a debate about a 3round QB who hasn’t played a down in the NFL.. Or base our draft Strategy on that QB.. lol 

no weak fuging opinion..

years of  production .. That’s the difference check their numbers in college compared to his and keep acting like you don’t see the difference.,

Don’t bother mate your brain will just start hurting. For some reason they think Corral is some world beating stud and not the project he was drafted in the 3rd to be 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

This is dumb and way to long and has nothing to do with the underline problem with your opinion..

1. Situation and context is void in your analogy., 

example .. Nobody questioned Russell talent.. Russell didn’t fail because he wasn’t talented he failed because he didn’t want to work on his craft ate to much and decided to not look at film.. Talent and desire to play football are 2 different things..

but again I don’t want to go down the rabbit hole of ppl with your narratives or the not drafting a QB community..  It’s been 4 years of QB band aids and bad QB play.. I’m done with the BS.. Time to change up strategies.. good night 

Fair enough on Russell but there a hundred of other top picks that just didn't pan out.  Tanking for one doesn't automatically change your direction.  It only shows your desperate. 

7 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Don’t bother mate your brain will just start hurting. For some reason they think Corral is some world beating stud and not the project he was drafted in the 3rd to be 

WRONG!!!!

You guys just brush him off as an afterthought and ASS-U-ME that because he was a 3rd round QB that he can't or won't compete for the job.  

There isn't a Burrow or Herbert or even a Lawrence in this draft class that would win the job outright.  My contention is and most likely accurate, Corral will compete for the position.  If he doesn't beat the guy out, so be it, but he'll get an opportunity to compete.  You guys think he has no chance, I don't agree. 

You tankers want a QB regardless of other needs and that only 1 or 2 are acceptable.  Anything less is a road down to mediocrity.  I say with this draft class if you have a better opportunity to go down that road anyhow.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Fair enough on Russell but there a hundred of other top picks that just didn't pan out.  Tanking for one doesn't automatically change your direction.  It only shows your desperate. 

WRONG!!!!

You guys just brush him off as an afterthought and ASS-U-ME that because he was a 3rd round QB that he can't or won't compete for the job.  

There isn't a Burrow or Herbert or even a Lawrence in this draft class that would win the job outright.  My contention is and most likely accurate, Corral will compete for the position.  If he doesn't beat the guy out, so be it, but he'll get an opportunity to compete.  You guys think he has no chance, I don't agree. 

You tankers want a QB regardless of other needs and that only 1 or 2 are acceptable.  Anything less is a road down to mediocrity.  I say with this draft class if you have a better opportunity to go down that road anyhow.

You get a little attacky when people don’t have the same opinion as you don’t ya hahah. Go outside and yell at the clouds you’ll feel better 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

And how many wins?  

 

What's the difference?  3-8 is 3-8 and this is with a 2nd year QB.  I guarantee you, if Fields was on this team the huddle would be screaming to tank for another QB. 

LOL this is the dude that called Lance a bust after one game.  One game in a god damn hurricane and this dude says he is a bust. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Fair enough on Russell but there a hundred of other top picks that just didn't pan out.  Tanking for one doesn't automatically change your direction.  It only shows your desperate. 

WRONG!!!!

You guys just brush him off as an afterthought and ASS-U-ME that because he was a 3rd round QB that he can't or won't compete for the job.  

There isn't a Burrow or Herbert or even a Lawrence in this draft class that would win the job outright.  My contention is and most likely accurate, Corral will compete for the position.  If he doesn't beat the guy out, so be it, but he'll get an opportunity to compete.  You guys think he has no chance, I don't agree. 

You tankers want a QB regardless of other needs and that only 1 or 2 are acceptable.  Anything less is a road down to mediocrity.  I say with this draft class if you have a better opportunity to go down that road anyhow.

Hurt 3rd round qbs dont compete with top 5 qbs in the nfl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Fair enough on Russell but there a hundred of other top picks that just didn't pan out.  Tanking for one doesn't automatically change your direction.  It only shows your desperate. 

WRONG!!!!

You guys just brush him off as an afterthought and ASS-U-ME that because he was a 3rd round QB that he can't or won't compete for the job.  

There isn't a Burrow or Herbert or even a Lawrence in this draft class that would win the job outright.  My contention is and most likely accurate, Corral will compete for the position.  If he doesn't beat the guy out, so be it, but he'll get an opportunity to compete.  You guys think he has no chance, I don't agree. 

You tankers want a QB regardless of other needs and that only 1 or 2 are acceptable.  Anything less is a road down to mediocrity.  I say with this draft class if you have a better opportunity to go down that road anyhow.

LoL. Calm down dude. Corral will get a chance to compete for the job.

Then all the people who support him or don’t support him will be validated  

QB is the #1 need this off-season as it has been the last 3 years. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Weak argument?? Lol 

You want to have a debate about a 3round QB who hasn’t played a down in the NFL.. Or base our draft Strategy on that QB.. lol 

no weak fuging opinion..

years of  production .. That’s the difference check their numbers in college compared to his and keep acting like you don’t see the difference.,

Their numbers at Ohio State and Alabama?

That's what you are hanging your hat on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can we stop with the stupid attention whore hot take type posts and just enjoy a winning streak for once? 
    • Every player has faults, and many times they can be categorized neatly into obvious traits that make analysis pretty straight-forward. A running back who thrives in zone schemes where their vision and patience is rewarded may struggle when asked to play a physical, violent, north-south style. A quarterback who can make every throw under the sun may never grasp the schematic purpose of the plays he is being asked to run and therefore constantly makes the wrong decision or no decision even with players running free. But the narrative for Bryce Young has almost consistently focused on his size and overall physicality in a league full of supermen, and how it places a hard limit on his ability to do things like shrug off blockers or throw tactical nuclear strikes from 80 yards out. Two seasons plus in hasn't put those concerns fully to rest, but if there is one underlining trait that could potentially derail Bryce's career, it's much more nebulous: his ability to recognize when a play is dead. The proclivity for turnovers that has haunted Bryce through his career doesn't always have the same underlying reasons as most typical young quarterbacks: adjusting to the speed of play, the tightness of NFL throwing windows, being able to diagnose much more advanced coverages, understanding the playbook, etc. One consistent thread is a defining trait that is both a curse and a strength: his ability to make plays off script, which has carried over from his Alabama days. For every miracle escape and razor-margin throw downfield like the 4th down play vs the Dolphins, you seem to have an inexcusable dropped fumble without even being touched (also see Dolphins game.) And the genesis of both is his underlying aggressiveness to make something happen with every snap, sometimes even when the play itself is simply unsalvageable. What often gets Young into trouble isn't an inability to execute a play, but his unwillingness to concede that the risk/reward ratio for a given decision simply isn't worth the attempt. There are few things that will drive a coach to putting a schematic leash on a player more quickly then when that player's outcomes become unpredictable, and even multiple miracle plays can be negated by a single colossal mistake. Where Bryce must find a balance is retaining the ability to conjure magic when needed, but to also keep his risk/reward instincts fully calibrated to what the team as a whole is comfortable with. No successful coach is entirely risk-averse, and many tend to be overly conservative in situations that decides the outcome of games, but "bad" Bryce sometimes emerges in situations where the only correct decision is to simply eat the ball and move on to the next play or next drive. If he can develop a better understanding of this flaw and work to overcome it without abandoning the traits that also make him special, he will take one step closer to becoming the player this franchise sacrificed so much for and redeeming that faith with the entire fanbase.
    • Is there a fifth option for welded shut and hermetically sealed?
×
×
  • Create New...