Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If season ended today which QB would you take.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Fright said:

Stroud... I hate OSU, but he has the better touch and build to last in the NFL.

If you were going to take an OSU qb they should have taken a shot at Fields last year. I believe the OSU qb curse but Fields has the best shot at breaking it. The only problem he faces is he landed on the wrong team. Stroud I fear will not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

If you were going to take an OSU qb they should have taken a shot at Fields last year. I believe the OSU qb curse but Fields has the best shot at breaking it. The only problem he faces is he landed on the wrong team. Stroud I fear will not.

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

When have the Bears ever developed a qb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

We will know if Fields landed on the wrong team this off-season. They have 130 or so million in cap space to repair the defense and offensive line. On top of that they are drafting high in the first. If they trade back a handful of spots they can still take a #1 WR. 
 

The Bears should be a team majorly on the rise in 2023 but we’ll see. 

They need to fix their line stat.  Ive watched the past 3 bears games and their line is probably as bad as ours was last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

If I was a bears fan I would be pumped about the future, they just need to spend some cash and draft well.  I suspect they will have the chance to get the best tackle in the draft since the teams ahead of them will be focused on the qbs

I honestly don't care what the Bears do or really Fields for that matter because I'm a Panthers fan and Fields is not on our team. But I don't begrudge you being a fan so have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, I'd stick with Matt Corral and see what we have there. Then spend the high draft pick on the top DE/Edge rusher in the draft and give our defense some teeth.

I think that's the safer bet.

I dont think I would call relying on a 3rd round qb that cannot even practice until august with a new staff and new offensive scheme "safe".

 

There is a ton of risk with picking a qb in the top 10 but at some point it has to be done

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "If only Bryce were <height>", he'd <insert stupid thing here>" was the bit and in direct response to multiple posters ridiculously blaming Bryce (and only Bryce) for the punt returns vs. New England. :3 I understand that folks desire balance, hence the "Bryce stans vs. Bryce haters" narrative but it's abundantly clear that the only people going into threads just to talk about Bryce are the haters. Meanwhile, daring to disagree that Bryce was completely at fault for something that happened on special teams gets the "stan" label. Shoot, I'm sure folks lump me in as a Bryce stan (Brycen stan? Absolutely. Bryce stan? Nah) just because I have the audacity to look at what the rest of the team is and isn't doing. 😛  
    • PJ Walker is the only QB in the Tepper era the Panthers managed to find wins with.  Only QB w/ a winning record.    PJ had success in pro ball before the Panthers.  He he had NFL tools.    He just is consistent and unreliable.  PJ Walker is what you call a bad/poor man's gunslinger.  He can provide highs and lows both virtually guaranteed.  He is NFL depth.  Bryce Young hasn't proven to improve a teams chances of winning better than the PJ Walker tier of QBing. PJ Walker can do things Bryce Young can't......and that a problem     
    • There isn’t but the thing is the team/system/staff around the QB ultimately dictates how successful that QB can be. You have Baker getting released midseason here vs playing like a MVP on another team. Darnold on the Jets/Panthers vs Vikings/Seahawks. Geno Smith on the Jets vs the Seahawks vs the Raiders. Mac Jones is looking as good as Purdy on the 49ers. You have to build a roster, culture, and system for these guys.  Obviously the QB has to be the leader and help elevate the team, but we are seeing what moving a “bad” QB to a stable franchise looks like. Daniel Jones might be doing the same but it’s too early to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...