Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thanksgiving Day football


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Haven't been keeping up with the thread but Daniel Jones is very obviously a tremendous liability. Daboll has done a great job but that team is going nowhere until the upgrade QB.

He has the same stats as Lamar Jackson.

And yet people somehow think that the latter isn't also the problem. 

Baltimore and both NYC teams might be in the draft a QB this spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He has the same stats as Lamar Jackson.

And yet people somehow think that the latter isn't also the problem. 

Baltimore and both NYC teams might be in the draft a QB this spring.

You realize you can just Google stats to avoid making insanely idiotic comments like this, right?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You realize you can just Google stats to avoid making insanely idiotic comments like this, right?

I did. Passer rating is within half a point completion percentage is almost identical. Passing yards are within 150 of each other.

Pretty much identical. 

Perhaps you could show me where my comprehension is off?

 

Lamar is at

63.4% 1977yds 16td 7int and 91.7 rating

Daniel is at

65.1 % 1937yds 9td 4int 89.8 rating

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I did. Passer rating is within half a point completion percentage is almost identical. Passing yards are within 150 of each other.

Pretty much identical. 

Perhaps you could show me where my comprehension is off?

 

Lamar is at

63.4% 1977yds 16td 7int and 91.7 rating

Daniel is at

65.1 % 1937yds 9td 4int 89.8 rating

 

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

The numbers are almost identical. 

I don't make them up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

Lamar has 666 yds rushing and 3 tds

Daniel has 451yds and 4tds

Seems pretty similar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lamar has 666 yds rushing and 3 tds

Daniel has 451yds and 4tds

Seems pretty similar?

In what world is nearly 50% more yards "pretty similar"?

You can keep making this argument if you want but there's nothing to support it. Lamar is an NFL MVP. Daniel Jones is a guy who sucks so bad that the Giants didn't even pick up his 5th year rookie contract option.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

In what world is nearly 50% more yards "pretty similar"?

You can keep making this argument if you want but there's nothing to support it. Lamar is an NFL MVP. Daniel Jones is a guy who sucks so bad that the Giants didn't even pick up his 5th year rookie contract option.

 

Yeah that math is spotty at best 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...