Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thanksgiving Day football


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Haven't been keeping up with the thread but Daniel Jones is very obviously a tremendous liability. Daboll has done a great job but that team is going nowhere until the upgrade QB.

He has the same stats as Lamar Jackson.

And yet people somehow think that the latter isn't also the problem. 

Baltimore and both NYC teams might be in the draft a QB this spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He has the same stats as Lamar Jackson.

And yet people somehow think that the latter isn't also the problem. 

Baltimore and both NYC teams might be in the draft a QB this spring.

You realize you can just Google stats to avoid making insanely idiotic comments like this, right?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You realize you can just Google stats to avoid making insanely idiotic comments like this, right?

I did. Passer rating is within half a point completion percentage is almost identical. Passing yards are within 150 of each other.

Pretty much identical. 

Perhaps you could show me where my comprehension is off?

 

Lamar is at

63.4% 1977yds 16td 7int and 91.7 rating

Daniel is at

65.1 % 1937yds 9td 4int 89.8 rating

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I did. Passer rating is within half a point completion percentage is almost identical. Passing yards are within 150 of each other.

Pretty much identical. 

Perhaps you could show me where my comprehension is off?

 

Lamar is at

63.4% 1977yds 16td 7int and 91.7 rating

Daniel is at

65.1 % 1937yds 9td 4int 89.8 rating

 

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

The numbers are almost identical. 

I don't make them up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

See the substantial difference in passing TDs? And I know it triggers you badly to talk about a QB running but those numbers matter too. To compare Daniel Jones and Lamar Jackson is just straight up idiocy. No defending it.

Lamar has 666 yds rushing and 3 tds

Daniel has 451yds and 4tds

Seems pretty similar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lamar has 666 yds rushing and 3 tds

Daniel has 451yds and 4tds

Seems pretty similar?

In what world is nearly 50% more yards "pretty similar"?

You can keep making this argument if you want but there's nothing to support it. Lamar is an NFL MVP. Daniel Jones is a guy who sucks so bad that the Giants didn't even pick up his 5th year rookie contract option.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

In what world is nearly 50% more yards "pretty similar"?

You can keep making this argument if you want but there's nothing to support it. Lamar is an NFL MVP. Daniel Jones is a guy who sucks so bad that the Giants didn't even pick up his 5th year rookie contract option.

 

Yeah that math is spotty at best 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
    • Cooter was a good dude for sure. 
    • We both been here about the same amount of time. Whatever happened to Livermush? I know Cooter passed aways years ago...and so many others?
×
×
  • Create New...