Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Rivalry Week


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He looks legit, but not sure running around like that can translate with bigger faster NFL players. Mahomes does seem to make it work though.

yeah... i dont like that stuff but Mahomes is the type of player who gets away with it because he is so elite. If there is a new gen of QBs thats coming with pocket presence/elusiveness and cannons for arms..... sign me up.  Zone defenses are going to hate that...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

yeah... i dont like that stuff but Mahomes is the type of player who gets away with it because he is so elite. If there is a new gen of QBs thats coming with pocket presence/elusiveness and cannons for arms..... sign me up.  Zone defenses are going to hate that...

Mahomes has some terrible habits that he somehow makes work. I’ve never seen anything like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Do I wish that Williams and/or Maye were draft eligible this year? Honestly, yeah. But they're not. If there's a guy on the board who you think can be a franchise QB you gotta take him. Period.

 

At this point I've given up on finding a franchise qb. I just want to find one better than anyone we've got right now. If they turn out to be a franchise qb down the road then great. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Nope, no exceptions.

The Playoffs should always have been the 4 best P5 champions. It's not that hard.

Team A goes 11-0 into the last week. Ranked #1 the entire season

Team B goes 11-0 into the last week. Ranked #2 the entire season.

Team A and B are in the same conf. and also the same div.

Team A and B meet for rivalry week. Winner goes to their conf. title game ... loser can't.

Yes, there are actually exceptions. If they were in different divs this year, OSU and MICH would be meeting again next week.

It's not that hard.

OSU will have one loss after next week. LSU could still lose tonight and next week, USC could still lose tonight and next week, Bama has 2 losses, Clemson has 2 losses, Oregon has 3 losses, and so on and so on. Who the hell would you give the #4 spot to after probably GA, MICH, and TCU?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...