Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams. Char observer on top 4 QBs Note, This is not in depth

Varking

By Varking,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Any bridge FA veteran that can walk and chew gum at the same time. Corral may or may not make the roster next year; I’m indifferent either way.  Camp competition will sort that out.  

Where we appear to differ, I don’t think a really good HC and OC will risk ruining the rookie QB by throwing him to the wolves his first season.  Too many draft capital at risk to do that.  JMO, YMMV

Lots of factors. Depends on the FO power, the HC, OC, QB we drafted, QB roster, etc.

I just don't see any way that Richardson could possibly help us in the short term. That doesn't seem like a 1st round type of move considering where we will likely be drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

El OH EL at people shitting on Corral and doubting him being on the roster next year. 

Well if we draft a rookie in the first and whoever our next HC we get wants to bring in their own vet that knows their system. I could easily see Corral being dumped it’s not the smartest roster construction having 3 QBs in the 53. We’d try and stash him on the PS but another team with an established starter might pinch him to try and develop. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Richardson has a ton of physical talent but he’s a long way from being a franchise QB in the NFL.  It’s not impossible that he makes that leap, but I wouldn’t bet on it happening with this Panthers organization unfortunately.

I keep seeing this, but we will have an entirely different coaching staff in a few months. No way to know how QB friendly it will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Lots of factors. Depends on the FO power, the HC, OC, QB we drafted, QB roster, etc.

I just don't see any way that Richardson could possibly help us in the short term. That doesn't seem like a 1st round type of move considering where we will likely be drafting.

I am intrigued by AR, but he does not seem like a top 5-10 pick right now. You're right. Now, if he falls to the 2nd...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I was bartending for the World Cup so I missed the second half once the Mexico game started, did Stroud drop off? Seemed like they started off pretty safe with the screen passes, that first td throw was nice

I was too busy to catch much of it but from what people are saying it sounds like he had a rough second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted

Any thought to getting a vet QB, seeing what Corral has, and grabbing Hooker/Ward/McCall/Penix on day 2 or 3? I like Bryce but his ceiling might be a PJ that doesn't turn the ball over. I like Richardson but it's so hard to evaluate him being surrounded by a horrible team, bad WR's, D sucked, possibly injured because they wouldn't let him run, tons of upside and he looked like the only NFL player on his team but big gamble for a guy that needs to sit for a year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

The person who posted the tweet is suggesting they return to a staff that hasn’t developed them. It just doesn’t make sense to me. 

He's basically saying Stroud isn't good enough for the NFL yet.

Pauline is a pretty well known draft analyst, but this isn't a widely held opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • electro's horse
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By electro's horse · Posted

      probably the 2nd worst draft in team history
    • tukafan21
      Strength of Schedule

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...