Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Sam Darnold play himself into becoming the 2023 starter?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ENC Pantherfan said:

I would still give a serious look at Robinson and Jefferson in the later 1st assuming we make the playoffs, but yes I would give Darnold maybe a 2 yr 35 mil 14 mil guarantee type deal.

I believe his projected market value for next year is 5.4 million per year. I could live with a 2yr 15 million deal with the first year guaranteed or something. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

Unless he can prove that he can put this team on his back and beat good sides by himself it will just be treading water having to pay him. If your gonna have a game manager your better off having them on a rookie contract so you can stack the rest of the side 

He's more than a game manager. 

Game managers are physically limited. 

Sam isn't 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to see him carry the offense to a win before I'm willing to give him any kind of significant deal or shot at starting next year.  He's been playing solid, but it's been mostly handing the ball off.  Without some kind of showcase game, I'd be ok bringing him back for backup money with the understanding that he's going to be the backup sooner or later to a rookie we're drafting.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only way I'm alright with it is if he's signed to a budget deal to keep the seat warm for a guy like Anthony Richardson. Im no way, shape, or form can you go forward thinking Sam Darnold is the long-term answer.

You are just wrong.

If Sam continues this upward trajectory with zero weapons you can feel good about him. And that would be the only way I would be ok with a gamble like Richardson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

I need to see him carry the offense to a win before I'm willing to give him any kind of significant deal or shot at starting next year.  He's been playing solid, but it's been mostly handing the ball off.  Without some kind of showcase game, I'd be ok bringing him back for backup money with the understanding that he's going to be the backup sooner or later to a rookie we're drafting.

You know he has been getting us in scoring position every game.

If he throws us to the 10. And we run it in from there that's awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offensive game plan is literally to minimize the QB throwing beyond the LOS as much as we possibly can. Let's see us in a situation where we have to throw to compete. Like Stroud was in tonight. Then we'll find out if Darnold has truly developed. Our game plans show me that our coaches don't think he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The offensive game plan is literally to minimize the QB throwing beyond the LOS as much as we possibly can. Let's see us in a situation where we have to throw to compete. Like Stroud was in tonight. Then we'll find out if Darnold has truly developed. Our game plans show me that our coaches don't think he has.

You haven't even watched the games. He made several big throws when we had to have them last week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not totally inconceivable that Sam can become a long term starter. This is the best OL he has ever had and he is in a system that fits him. Plus he’s only 25.

 

However, you probably don’t want to bet on it. He needs a cheap deal and some competition. He has a long way to go before he makes people forget about his past. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The deep ball or at least the threat thereof is an absolutely essential component of success in today's NFL, and not the '20 air yard' nonsense that the NFL likes to push. Teams have to account for the field-flipping, immediate TD play or else they just sit on things. We've seen it for years now. And with respect to Brees, the latter half of his career has him as the ultimate short-game QB... and it still wasn't enough to overcome the best competition when it counted most. When that element went missing towards the second half of the 2010s they were still a deadly team when they had superior defense, but they ultimately fell to the best defenses.
    • Dude.. that sounds so sad. 
    • Bryce either finds a deep ball this year or he doesn’t.  His success hinges on that entirely. is there a successful QB currently playing that doesn’t have an accurate deep throw? there are only so many underneath plays in a playbook. if that’s all bro can do, expect a pick 6 record. Defenses are too fast and smart. A devastating run game is going to 1000% have to be the thing that keeps defense honest if Bryce’s deep ball doesn’t improve. The importance of that one attribute can not be overlooked.  I so wish people would stop insulting Brees, a top 10 first ballot HOF’er with these stupid Bryce comparisons. Brees could drop a 40 yd DIME on a rollout or from shotgun.    I want the Panthers to win. I don’t care who pilots the ship. I don’t really care about any of the individual pieces.   
×
×
  • Create New...