Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most Efficient Passing Game in the past 6 Weeks


Ghostface Chilla
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Career rating would have finished 32nd of qualifying QBs this year. Not good. His first four years were pretty terrible. That doesn’t mean I have to ignore what looks like progress. 
 

Y’all can deny it, but I know you know we’d be division champs if Darnold was healthy all year. 

Just saying he looked good last night against Dallas.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

I’d be more entertaining if attempting to troll. I think anyone unhappy with signing Darnold for two years at 5mil per  is trolling. That would instantly give us a top 5 backup QB situation in the league for the value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

I think they're still in the Pie thread.

Nah im back on this one. Yep he looked like crap yesterday BUT with his overall performance this year I would sign him to a normal deal for what he has produced so far in his career and nothing amazing. If he takes it bring him in to compete in camp. He looked better overall and looked as if he could potentially be a backup. So his game yesterday stunk, does that mean we should throw him away if he is willing to sign a very fair deal? Not at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Sam had a shitty game yesterday, but not much help either. Our receivers could not get open or really help our QB (like other receivers around the league). I'm sure having a bygone era OC in McAdoo can shoulder a lot of the blame for that. If we retain Wilks and Sam, I anticipate we pick up an OC with schemes for present day NFL and start to look a lot better next season. We draft a QB, WR, TE, another edge rusher and line backer, and trade for some secondary help and we're punching in our ticket to the Yoffs next season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

You had everything to say when he looked halfway serviceable but when he puts out a bottom 10 NFL history passer rating people just hate him and are out to get him. We know who you are. You have no standards. Cool.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Career rating would have finished 32nd of qualifying QBs this year. Not good. His first four years were pretty terrible. That doesn’t mean I have to ignore what looks like progress. 
 

Y’all can deny it, but I know you know we’d be division champs if Darnold was healthy all year. 

Division champs with Darnold and where would that leave us this offseason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Division champs with Darnold and where would that leave us this offseason?

Probably overpaying to resign him. The way it worked out, we may be able to sign him to a cheap backup deal instead. I don't understand why signing a backup QB who would have us in playoff contention is a bad thing to some here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ghostface Chilla said:

Yeah, Sam had a shitty game yesterday, but not much help either. Our receivers could not get open or really help our QB (like other receivers around the league). I'm sure having a bygone era OC in McAdoo can shoulder a lot of the blame for that. If we retain Wilks and Sam, I anticipate we pick up an OC with schemes for present day NFL and start to look a lot better next season. We draft a QB, WR, TE, another edge rusher and line backer, and trade for some secondary help and we're punching in our ticket to the Yoffs next season. 

My thoughts exactly!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...