Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do the Bears trade Fields and draft QB at 1?


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MartyClemons said:

I think we’ve played ourselves out of that spot. If Chicago decides to trade down I’m guessing they’ll still target Anderson/Carter or someone closer to top 5.

This is what Chicago is hoping for. Get extra picks but keep in range of either Anderson or Carter. They need them both. So getting one plus more players is their goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

Just to be clear, I love D.J. Moore, and had his picture as my profile picture prior to the current. However, I just cannot think of a scenario where Carolina will make a deal with Chicago without giving him up.

I agree with you actually. I don’t know if we would do it but I think that’s the only offer they accept from us. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Just to be clear, I love D.J. Moore, and had his picture as my profile picture prior to the current. However, I just cannot think of a scenario where Carolina will make a deal with Chicago without giving him up.

the only reason the deal makes sense is if you believe DJ Moore is being held back by our QBs - which I do and I bet Chicago would, too.  DJ plus OL upgrades instantly makes that an extremely dangerous offense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I agree with you actually. I don’t know if we would do it but I think that’s the only offer they accept from us. 

It's going to be tough. About half the teams in the league will be at least inquiring about that pick, with Tepper being the most aggressive.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

You’re an idiot if you think I’m an OSU fanboy. That’s not who I pull for at all. Full stop. 

Look at your post history you thought Fields was the greatest thing since slice bread now you think Stroud and Young are on the same level (they are not remotely close), you probably were on the Haskins bandwagon 

 

Either way Fields is one of the main reasons the bears have a terrible pass game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

The Bears could flip the script on their franchise with the haul from trading pick 1 and their 100 mill for FA 

This is exactly their goal. 140 million after cuts, can trade the first pick for a haul… you get super competitive for next season in one offseason and hope to boom the one after that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

This is exactly their goal. 140 million after cuts, can trade the first pick for a haul… you get super competitive for next season in one offseason and hope to boom the one after that. 

if they pick the right trade partner it's likely multiple top 10 picks (this year/in the future) as it is exceedingly rare a first round QB wins many games.  This could redefine that team, and if Fields flames out next year, they'll be in position to do their own trade up for a different QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Look at your post history you thought Fields was the greatest thing since slice bread now you think Stroud and Young are on the same level (they are not remotely close), you probably were on the Haskins bandwagon 

 

Either way Fields is one of the main reasons the bears have a terrible pass game 

Maybe you should actually look into my post history. I was never on the Haskins bandwagon. I was on the Fields one. I was on the Herbert one, too. Stroud is who I like this year. That being said, I’m very clearly a Florida Gator fan and lots of folks here can vouch for that. Assume less about me going forward. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

This is exactly their goal. 140 million after cuts, can trade the first pick for a haul… you get super competitive for next season in one offseason and hope to boom the one after that. 

After watching what Diggs did for Allen and AJ Brown did for Hurts their first move needs to be get Fields a No1 WR, Claypool ain’t that guy but he’s a solid piece 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

After watching what Diggs did for Allen and AJ Brown did for Hurts their first move needs to be get Fields a No1 WR, Claypool ain’t that guy but he’s a solid piece 

Claypool would be a solid 2, just like Mooney. They need a 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...