Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

AR scouting Report.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Comparing the 49ers to the Panthers is like comparing a Porsche to a Kia. We need all the picks we can get.

We’re comparing assets not the roster.. Keep up

and to be honest us being 9 not mid teens and being a worst team makes us a better trade partner then the 49ers were 2 years ago 

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SF had their roster set, but wanted to upgrade from Jimmy. We aren’t close to that so if we sacrifice that much draft capital, it would kill us if we got a Lance like result. They just had to smooth over the Jimmy debacle.

Got it.. But the point was (reading comprehension) if we need to move up for a QB we can..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

Even with picking 1 of them up in Free Agency they still won’t pass on 1 of them blue chip Dlinemen.. They are in position to develop a super dline

Everyone wants them to pick up Carter but if you get Payne, Hargraves and draft Anderson… that’s a lot of getting after the passer when the Bears only had 20 sacks this season. 
 

Folks here love to rip Burns but Burns almost kept up with the Chicago Bears as a team. We had 35 and our pass rush was bad. They were the worst in the NFL. Hargraves and Payne would just need to do what they did this year to our produce the whole roster. Adding Anderson to that would be really sick. 
 

So I think a lot will depend on free agency. If you can snag Yannick too you are looking at 40 sacks from your front 4. 
 

I wanted Chicago last year to grab Pickens but they went for Brisker who turned out good. They should go for Johnston in a trade back if they can swing it. They need a true 1. He has the potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

Everyone wants them to pick up Carter but if you get Payne, Hargraves and draft Anderson… that’s a lot of getting after the passer when the Bears only had 20 sacks this season. 
 

Folks here love to rip Burns but Burns almost kept up with the Chicago Bears as a team. We had 35 and our pass rush was bad. They were the worst in the NFL. Hargraves and Payne would just need to do what they did this year to our produce the whole roster. Adding Anderson to that would be really sick. 
 

So I think a lot will depend on free agency. If you can snag Yannick too you are looking at 40 sacks from your front 4. 
 

I wanted Chicago last year to grab Pickens but they went for Brisker who turned out good. They should go for Johnston in a trade back if they can swing it. They need a true 1. He has the potential. 

Cool I hope it works that way.. It will take a mountain to get there but if we can have our choice of Young or CJ I’d love it.. But I need to see it before I believe they pass on 1 of them blue chippers..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

We’re comparing assets not the roster.. Keep up

and to be honest us being 9 not mid teens and being a worst team makes us a better trade partner then the 49ers were 2 years ago 

I don't think you grasp that they could afford to give up assets since they are and were better. Every team technically has assets. We can't afford to give them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If he drops to second round, he is a guy you run to the podium to get. 

In the first.....that's dicey. In the top ten, that's the pick that will likely sign your exit papers as a GM.

He’s not dropping.. Especially after underwear workouts.. The potential of the player and desperation of the teams are both 2 high for him to drop.. But he still isn’t a day 1 starter.. He needs to sit for a year..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

He’s not dropping.. Especially after underwear workouts.. The potential of the player and desperation of the teams are both 2 high for him to drop.. But he still isn’t a day 1 starter.. He needs to sit for a year..

If not more than a year.

We aren't in a position to be that patient with him. 

He is really best suited to going to a team with an established and possibly aging starter that you expect to retire or be gone in the next 2-3 seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I don't think you grasp that they could afford to give up assets since they are and were better. Every team technically has assets. We can't afford to give them up.

Depending on the prospect.. Just because your opinion is these QB,a aren’t worth it doesn’t mean the team does.. If it was Lawrence or Burrows you wouldn’t give 2 shits if we could afford giving up the assets..

And let’s not act like this team is devoid of talent and getting a good young QB wouldn’t be a major step forward..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

If not more than a year.

We aren't in a position to be that patient with him. 

He is really best suited to going to a team with an established and possibly aging starter that you expect to retire or be gone in the next 2-3 seasons. 

Why not!! That’s the problem with the team now not being patient hopefully that has changed.. 

Agree to disagree.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...