Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

That’s cool, and I agree with your first paragraph. I’m not down with the 2nd. My backup can’t be both inaccurate and have serious issues with processing what they’re seeing on the field. 

And, as long we’re being consistent with our labeling, I’m cool. If you’re going to call one inaccurate, and point to his numbers as proof, then we need to do the same with others that display those same %’s.

Jake Delhomme was 59.4% and Derek Anderson was 54.3%. I've read on these boards that both these guys and Darnold are more accurate than Cam. This doesn't compute.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

 

Still having a difficult time not insulting ppl with a differing opinion I see.

 

Not one person wants Sam back as our starter. But don't let that stop you from a good insult. 

I ignore you and now I get flooded with poo reactions. I have sympathy for you.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

 

Still having a difficult time not insulting ppl with a differing opinion I see.

 

Not one person wants Sam back as our starter. But don't let that stop you from a good insult. 

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

You're still stewing because I disagreed with your immediate reaction to one of the ten worst passer ratings in league history by blaming the receivers for not being open. Now who's the angry one?

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

Jake Delhomme was 59.4% and Derek Anderson was 54.3%. I've read on these boards that both these guys and Darnold are more accurate than Cam. This doesn't compute.

Jake Delhomme didn't really play in the present-day era.   Completion % averages and expectations for the QB have gone up because of the way the game is called now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

I ignore you and now I get flooded with poo reactions. I have sympathy for you.

Look at it this way :

They value your opinion for the amount of poo you get.

If they didn't, they wouldn't give a s--t.

 

Kind of like if, for example, I say "I don't care what you say about this and that....yadda yadda yadda" and then poo your post when I don't agree with your opinion on yadda yadda yadda....That means that I actually do care.  Think About It GIF by Identity

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

When was this said and by who?

It's been a thing that's been said for years on this board, mostly by people who never wanted Cam Newton on our team for whatever reason, not just in Cam's last season. Most recent guy I can think of who debated this was Catsfan69, but there have been other posters who aren't memorable over the last decade make the same claims.

Edited by X-Clown
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Look at it this way :

They value your opinion for the amount of poo you get.

If they didn't, they wouldn't give a s--t.

 

Kind of like if, for example, I say "I don't care what you say about this and that....yadda yadda yadda" and then poo your post when I don't agree with your opinion on yadda yadda yadda....That means that I actually do care.  /cdn-cgi/mirage/b6cc59609b429d59b0b691caa850d7f0ab8f4d8040b169c31c378b70f8c1014a/1280/https://media2.giphy.com/media/d3mlE7uhX8KFgEmY/200.gif

These interactions are just for fun. Even when things get testy (butthead laugh) between people. But Gerry Green aka iamhubby1 does not practice what he preaches so don't fall for it. I laugh at him and wish him well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

 

Yeah, but it's so much fun getting them all riled up. And it's so easy. Just say something positive and watch the fireworks. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
    • I mean, first of all, I'm not the one who initially said he was a life long fan, it was in that tweet in the OP. But more importantly, "life long fan" is a relative term, especially for a franchise like the Panthers.  I think anyone who was say, 10-12 or younger when the franchise started, and been a fan since the start, could claim to be a life long fan. I'm 38, been a fan of the team since year 1 even though I'm not even from the Carolinas, after almost 30 years of fandom and following them since the beginning, I have no issue saying I'm a life long Panthers fan. Very possible his dad is say around 40 years old and been a Panthers fan since the start.  And even if he's a little older, if you're a fan of a team for 30 out of your say 45ish years of life... that's "life long" in that instance.
×
×
  • Create New...