Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold’s Market Value per Spotrac

ECHornet

By ECHornet,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Okay, is anyone else having a problem with ONLY page 6 on this thread? I can't reply to anything nor does it load properly. 

This has been happening to me a lot - If I wait long enough, usually a page becomes "interactable" again. Not sure what's up, it only seems an issue on the last page. I was wondering if it was my adblocker.

edit: Definitely gets worse as more posts are added to a page - I've seen a few other posters comment on this too.

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Okay, is anyone else having a problem with ONLY page 6 on this thread? I can't reply to anything nor does it load properly. 

 

Well, let's see? 

 

Edit to add; Seems to be working for me. But, I have Spectrum. Does that matter?

Edited by Gerry Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It happens all the time on this app. Some days are worse than others but today it is it's normal bad. You're not the only one @kungfoodude

 

How can you use a phone for the Huddle. I tried it for about an hour and could not stand having to enlarge the print just to read. It's either laptop, or nothing in this house. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

How can you use a phone for the Huddle. I tried it for about an hour and could not stand having to enlarge the print just to read. It's either laptop, or nothing in this house. lol

I do it to keep from typing long winded posts. Trust me you should be thankful I do. But i agree with the keyboard thing. Now you know why I have so many typos lol.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No. I have spectrum also. It's the app. I've been having trouble with it all season.  It's a new issue I suppose. 

 

I got my first smart phone about 2 years ago. I just could not stand that little writing. Having to enlarge, then scroll, just to read 1 post just got to me. If I have anything of import to say, I'm on the laptop. Of course, 2 years ago I had an actual life. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

I got my first smart phone about 2 years ago. I just could not stand that little writing. Having to enlarge, then scroll, just to read 1 post just got to me. If I have anything of import to say, I'm on the laptop. Of course, 2 years ago I had an actual life. 

That's sounds eerily familiar.  Between my bad eyes and fat fingers it takes me forever to type something out.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw4 Veteran

outlaw4

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

If it's a fairly easy negotiation and we can get him under 5 to compliment a rookie QB deal, then I guess? He's a backup who you can win some games with, depending on the matchup.  

The entire QB market is beyond slim pickings.  The other options are basically Cooper Rush, Gardner Minshew, Mike White, Taylor Heinicke, Jacoby Brissett, Drew Lock & Mason Rudolph.

We don't need to pay Jimmy G or Daniel Jones, those guys can go elsewhere.

 

Brissett might be the only real "upgrade" over what we have now and I believe he's going to be asking for starter money.

But if we can keep Darnold for around $5 mil a year, that I can digest as long as we have some new rookie QBs we can put in when the time's right. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...