Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL coaching news


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Pretty expensive to live in San Fran...might take some extra cash to get him there.

Having lived in Cali in recent years, I also think it's a pretty crap city.  The best spots are across the bridge by Sausalito or far south outside town.  The actual city has really dipped in quality.  Even the trendy/cool neighborhoods for older millennial couples/young fams.  This is coming from a City Planner 🙂  Oakland is even looking better with the amount of improvements going on.   San Fran has just had such a disappointing trajectory after being a standard bearer in many ways in the early 00s.  Same goes for Portland.  

East coast & some of the resurgent midwest cities are what's up.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Having lived in Cali in recent years, I also think it's a pretty crap city.  The best spots are across the bridge by Sausalito or far south outside town.  The actual city has really dipped in quality.  Even the trendy/cool neighborhoods for older millennial couples/young fams.  This is coming from a City Planner 🙂  Oakland is even looking better with the amount of improvements going on.   San Fran has just had such a disappointing trajectory after being a standard bearer in many ways in the early 00s.  Same goes for Portland.  

East coast & some of the resurgent midwest cities are what's up.  

 

When theres a poop app for your city, its over...

 

Dam shame, cause san fran truly is ultra comfy.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

No, Wilks was an interim HC.  It has to be HC or GM to get the comp pick. Coordinators and staffers don't count.

Did they not changed the rules(again?). It goes for corporate jobs now(i think)....lookup san fran and comp picks, they lead...got like 6 extra picks due. Like if you hire and its a promotion type of deal, I could be off, but rules changes happen soooo much now.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

No, Wilks was an interim HC.  It has to be HC or GM to get the comp pick. Coordinators and staffers don't count.

Someone else asked this, and apparently since a coach has been hired Wilks is no longer interim head coach and his title reverts back to DB coach.

So yeah, we would.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the reason?

From the article...

If you are to believe what people in Mobile are saying, it’s due to Kyler Murray — and it’s not because the quarterback has a large say in the matter.

Rather, many of the desired candidates don’t want to take the job knowing they’ll be tied to the hip of Murray for the next four seasons. Murray signed a five-year, $230 million contract in late August, and anyone who takes the Cardinals job will have no options in the foreseeable future at quarterback.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...