Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sexy draft Prospect…


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Reeled one in. Of course I’m not being serious, hence the wasted money comment. He looked like he was running in cement. We gave him $450k for every return where he didn’t put the ball on the ground.

Gotcha.  Yeah the wasted money comment was clear but it was the "he shined" part of your post that was hard to infer sarcasm from.  I was like.....were we watching the same guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

We have neglected KR/PR forever in the draft.

Hence why I said in my offseason predictions that we would do so again.

I've never really understood why. KR/PR is free field position. We have all seen what guys like Hester could do in the return game. An extra 6-8 yards on a return can mean the difference in a game, especially if it's coming down to a field goal. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I've never really understood why. KR/PR is free field position. We have all seen what guys like Hester could do in the return game. An extra 6-8 yards on a return can mean the difference in a game, especially if it's coming down to a field goal. 

I can't explain it either. We just seem to think any JAG WR can get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Also, Clayton Tune has the most Brock Purdy potential in this class. 

tune has my attention. i mean in no way should we draft somoene like him hoping that he could be the starter, but if we draft a QB in the first round (and we should absolutely do that), we should also draft another one later...or at least pick up one as a udfa. i mean after the first 4 guys there's a good crop of "maybe" guys out there who would be worth a shot. 

as much as i like even stroud and young, there's no way i would be ok coming out of this draft with just one QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rayzor said:

tune has my attention. i mean in no way should we draft somoene like him hoping that he could be the starter, but if we draft a QB in the first round (and we should absolutely do that), we should also draft another one later...or at least pick up one as a udfa. i mean after the first 4 guys there's a good crop of "maybe" guys out there who would be worth a shot. 

as much as i like even stroud and young, there's no way i would be ok coming out of this draft with just one QB. 

I liked Tune a lot at first but his deeper balls and throwing motion are big knocks.  He's close with most else.

Size - check, Enough speed - check, led comebacks/good poise - check, good awareness/pressure sensitive - check, he's tough as nails too.  

Issues: He throws like a baseball, he has almost a wind up.  Also loses accuracy beyond 20-yarders.  

Would love him R4-6.  Originally thought he was a riser and was liking him, but he's got some limitations. Just doesn't quite have the arm talent and accuracy on deeper routes.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

I thought the 28 catches this year was the breakout? I means he did get his first and only TD at that pivotal moment in the 4th at Cincy when we were only down 42-7.

I really hope we get the new QB some WR/TE help. No CMC out of the backfield and just DJ doesn’t cut it.

It’s gonna be okay bruv. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

We keep saying this.  Hopefully, this year will be an actual breakout year for Marshall. 

He’s flashed.

 

He might end up being a bust, but there has been enough malfunction in this organization’s leadership (and QB) that it’s not unreasonable to assume the jury is still out on not just Marshall, but many young players. 
 

That being said, Marshall isn’t stopping me from drafting another receiver by any means.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I liked Tune a lot at first but his deeper balls and throwing motion are big knocks.  He's close with most else.

Size - check, Enough speed - check, led comebacks/good poise - check, good awareness/pressure sensitive - check, he's tough as nails too.  

Issues: He throws like a baseball, he has almost a wind up.  Also loses accuracy beyond 20-yarders.  

Would love him R4-6.  Originally thought he was a riser and was liking him, but he's got some limitations. Just doesn't quite have the arm talent and accuracy on deeper routes.  

yeah i wouldn't want any of these QBs after the first 4 until well after round 4. i'm thinking 5th or later. and maybe a udfa as a practice squad guy. i'd like to see a full QB room and with a good few options, esp. in case of injury. i'd like the panthers under Reich to be QB university.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yeah i wouldn't want any of these QBs after the first 4 until well after round 4. i'm thinking 5th or later. and maybe a udfa as a practice squad guy. i'd like to see a full QB room and with a good few options, esp. in case of injury. i'd like the panthers under Reich to be QB university.

I'm trying to question myself on where I got with my QB preferences this week. Take a sober look back at the season and ignoring all the hype circles and mocks:

-I'm still really trying to like Levis but still having a very difficult time.  I want to like him and get hyped but just can't. 

-I bought into McKee's story and potential a bit too much wanting someone to rise from that second tier ranks.  At the end of the day, he simply should have produced more.  He just doesn't give me the feel of a guy who can score at will.  Closer to Davis Mills 2.0 than a 1st Rounder. 

-I've been a bit hard on Jaren Hall and Hendon Hooker--Looking back, they have some great qualities and had some really nice stretches.  They're rising again for me in the non-top tier.  If you can get past their age (similar to Levis), I think there's great reasons to take them.  

-I still am a bit weary with Duggan even if he looked like one of the better guys at the Senior Bowl.  Just doesn't do enough as a passer to warrant anything more than a 4th.

-Jake Haener is the only one after the top-4 that I've remained high on outside of Young & Stroud.  I was following him last year, was so bummed he had to miss some weeks, but I just see him playing on Sundays.  If a guy like Bailey Zappe does, Haener sure as hell does and more.   He could be a 3rd rounder come draft time.  Seems to have beefed up a tad as well which was needed (really his biggest knock, he's got so much to like outside of being a pencil).

-Still really wish four guys declared: Jayden Daniels, Cameron Ward, Michael Penix, & Michael Pratt.  They could've made money and climbed up this QB board easily.  Penix specifically.  He could get lost in the shuffle next year.  

-Bagent, T-R, O'Connell & Cuninngham are all kind of off my radar/UDFAs

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...