Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

There us zero logic in trading 9 for fields. If the Panthers has wanted Fields, they would have drafted him, ND enjoyed his full rookie contract. They aren't going to trade 9 for 1 year of Fields. He hasn't proven he's worthy of an extension.  

If the Panthers trade away 9, they are moving up to get their guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I don't know if he will be great or not.  The question is would you trade the number 9 pick for him?  Is he worth the number 9 pick?  The answer is an easy YES.  It's all irrelevant because he isn't on the trade block much less for just a first round pick.

You are insane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

There us zero logic in trading 9 for fields. If the Panthers has wanted Fields, they would have drafted him, ND enjoyed his full rookie contract. They aren't going to trade 9 for 1 year of Fields. He hasn't proven he's worthy of an extension.  

If the Panthers trade away 9, they are moving up to get their guy. 

Why would it be only one year of Fields? 

Edited by Toomers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

There us zero logic in trading 9 for fields. If the Panthers has wanted Fields, they would have drafted him, ND enjoyed his full rookie contract. They aren't going to trade 9 for 1 year of Fields. He hasn't proven he's worthy of an extension.  

If the Panthers trade away 9, they are moving up to get their guy. 

You think the same people are running the show that were running it then??  Rhule had full roster control and just traded for Darnold thinking he was the answer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You are insane. 

I mean the currently think he is valued higher than the first overall pick right?  Otherwise the GM wouldn't say he is their guy and the top pick is for sale.  They seem to prefer to keep Fields and use the number one pick to acquire more picks and actually draft players that will fill actual needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

La Confora was the one who also reported that Lamar Jackson could be had for picks. 🤷‍♂️

He is all over the place as most reporters are this time of year.  I'm sure it's by design for the GMs.  It does make the offseason more exciting though.  What else would we be talking about aside from our new staff (which I'm liking!)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...