Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr’s destination betting odds


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, TJKJ23xx said:

Zay Flowers looks the best imo but Johnston has the most potential if he can put it all together. 

Idk where he's projected, but I watched a piece from Smitty on Zay, and I'm all in on him.  Dude sold me.  He is going to be a serious problem in the league as he has so many translatable skills that just pop.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Idk where he's projected, but I watched a piece from Smitty on Zay, and I'm all on on him.  Dude sold me.  He is going to be a serious problem in the league as he has so many translatable skills that just pop.  

I’ve seen him any where from top 15 to early 2nd but yea he looks like he will be the next cream of the crop WR in the NFL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

He didn’t seem that elite this year. 

He also had a crappy situation with an idiot HC.

The last couple years have been incredibly unstable there and he's had to carry that franchise without any grown up help.

McDaniels is a nutcase. Raiders is the perfect team for him.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Until proven otherwise. I will continue to be skeptical of any QB we bring in from another team.
If Carr is brought in fine. Hope he works out. But I won’t be surprised if he doesn’t.  

Carr is a lot better and more established than any QB we've had since Cam and easily would be among the top 3 the franchise has had.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone wants to venture over to a Raiders forum I'd be curious to hear what the average take is on Carr and his time there now that he is officially gone. He has never lacked the talent. But he just had the lowest completion percentage since his rookie year. How much of it was McDaniels? The other layer is he will be 32 in March. So that's what a 5-6 year window maybe? Not every guy is going to be Brady and play well into their 40's. We should just be as realistic as possible about this knowing not only his circumstances but our own in our failures of pursuing other teams castoffs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing. You compared him to Jake. Jake was signed to the practice squad out of college. Bryce was the number 1 overall. Their expectations are wildly different and so are their contracts. You can talk all you want about what a player is and where they are now and all this other mumbo jumbo, but Jake never had a 5th year option and we weren't talking about the possibility of a top 5 QB contract extension at the end of his 3rd year. What he was expected to be matters because we invested heavily at a cost of future capital, including a 2nd round pick this year, for him to be that guy. The cost to add Bryce took value from the team. To be worth it, he has to add that value back.  Actually, I don't prefer yards, TDs, or only INTs. All those stats by themselves are misleading which is why I said you have to use a lot of different stats. ADOT - Average depth of target.  Completion %. Pretty obvious until you factor in ADOT. 0-5 has a lot higher C% than 10-15%. Hang time. If a pass is in the air for 4.6 seconds vs 3.1 on a 40 yards throw, that gives a DB a lot of time to correct. Is it a loft or is it a laser.  EPA - Expected points added. A way of measuring QB efficiency on every play.  CPOE - ranking pass completions based on several factors, not just the throw.  There's obviously more, but those are the more common.  Typical stats don't show everything. You need to look all over. Looking at a stat line is lazy. That's why I said, you need to analyze everything. Once you start looking at the numbers you start looking at the player. That's why you follow numbers. They lead you places. You look at what happening when the numbers show you patterns. That's where you start finding the problems that yards, TDs and Ints won't show you.     
    • It's not relevant who wins or loses. It's about actually attempting to get better at the position.
    • Thank you. I don't understand how the Bryce stans don't see this. I've never seen a player get more hyped for doing so little. Honestly it's driving me a little insane.
×
×
  • Create New...