Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 CJ Trade


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Shocker said:

I don’t think we can get the #1 pick.  If I am Chicago I am not moving down to 9.  Just not.  If we moved up twice then possibly but that would cost like everything.  We need a player to drop to 3 to give us a chance to move up.

Chicago may draft Young or Stroud with #1. Then trade Fields.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

There continues to be rumors that they might draft Stroud or Young #1 and then trading Fields. One rumor had them trading him to the Panthers for #9. 

Of course there are rumors! Ryan Poles would be failing at his job if he didn't make the texans and colts think they could take a QB. It's all about driving up the cost of that #1 pick.

Trust me, Chicago is not taking a QB and not trading Fields. Lots and lots of reasons to not trade Fields. Also lots of reasons to make other FO's think you are open to trading him and taking a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I swear people sleep on Fields.

Once he gets a Oline and some weapons he's going to be scary.

Yeah people need to watch that Clemson game again. Carr will never carry a team like that, or how Fields kept the Bears watchable last year. Stroud has a different style but showed enough in that Georgia game that I would easily trade up from him or straight up trade #9 for Fields even though we should have just drafted him for free when we had the chance. Carr is not as talented/tough as either guy and 2021 was probably his peak which resulted in not much

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...