Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go for Carr hard and save #9 pick?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Way more confident that Fitt can make a trade then Hurney and Gettelmen..

I'm more confident that he can make a trade that makes sense than Hurney. Oh, Hurney could make it happen but he could also cripple us in the process. I imagine Gettleman was probably really hard to deal with. Everything with that guy is a dick measuring contest. He has to feel like he's winning bigly every time. That's highly unlikely to happen when you're looking at trading into the top 5 of the draft.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm more confident that he can make a trade that makes sense than Hurney. Oh, Hurney could make it happen but he could also cripple us in the process. I imagine Gettleman was probably really hard to deal with. Everything with that guy is a dick measuring contest. He has to feel like he's winning bigly every time. That's highly unlikely to happen when you're looking at trading into the top 5 of the draft.

Agreed.. That’s 1 thing I’ll give Fitts his trades haven’t been crippling and he seem to have a good reputation with other GM’s..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Agreed.. That’s 1 thing I’ll give Fitts his trades haven’t been crippling and he seem to have a good reputation with other GM’s..

Yeah, I supported Gettleman while he was here but that Norman fiasco soured me big time. The further we were removed from Gettleman and watching him do the same things in NY forced me to admit that firing him was the right call even if it was for all the wrong reasons. Those wrong reasons being bringing Hurney back to ink career achievement contracts for JR's favorite aging vets. It's ironic that Gettleman got himself fired for losing a dick measuring contest where he was actually absolutely right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I supported Gettleman while he was here but that Norman fiasco soured me big time. The further we were removed from Gettleman and watching him do the same things in NY forced me to admit that firing him was the right call even if it was for all the wrong reasons. Those wrong reasons being bringing Hurney back to ink career achievement contracts for JR's favorite aging vets. It's ironic that Gettleman got himself fired for losing a dick measuring contest where he was actually absolutely right.

Yep!! I didn’t understand Gettelmen ego and why he let it make the moves he did.. Gross negotiation, thinking he could replace 2 whole positions groups in 1 offseason.. making  moves that voided you having back to back winning seasons.. I just didn’t get why Gettelmen couldn’t live in success..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yep!! I didn’t understand Gettelmen ego and why he let it make the moves he did.. Gross negotiation, thinking he could replace 2 whole positions groups in 1 offseason.. making  moves that voided you having back to back winning seasons.. I just didn’t get why Gettelmen couldn’t live in success..

I just don't think he had any actual big picture vision. He just focused on "winning" each individual dick measuring contest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2023 at 12:16 PM, CRA said:

I think it does.  You sign Carr, then you need to use those resources on aiding him.  Not drafting a QB.  Because while a low end version of it....he is a plug in and try to win QB.   

I don't get the Carr and draft a talented rookie QB narrative working together.  

Breathing room to get the rookie pick right? We have been waiting since Cam got hurt.   This franchise has had nothing but time and room.  There is no perfect storm you can keep waiting on. 

Agree

Carr is going to cost a lot of money 

is he worth it, hard to say…I think McDaniels is franchise killer and Carr was treated not well

but Carr is serviceable.  So was Bridgewater.  So was fill in the blank

I'm Pretty tired of wounded, underproducing QBs,  other teams cast offs 

it’s time for the Panthers to go big   Go get Stroud  whatever it takes

just freakin do it

the GM has said over and over again ‘desired position is to draft and grow a qb’

with this coaching staff of supposed ‘teachers’, the time is now 

if not now, when?

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Agree

Carr is going to cost a lot of money 

is he worth it, hard to say…I think McDaniels is franchise killer and Carr was treated not well

but Carr is serviceable.  So was Bridgewater.  So was fill in the blank

I'm Pretty tired of wounded, underproducing QBs,  other teams cast offs 

it’s time for the Panthers to go big   Go get Stroud  whatever it takes

just freakin do it

the GM has said over and over again ‘desired position is to draft and grow a qb’

with this coaching staff of supposed ‘teachers’, the time is now 

if not now, when?

 

Yes do what you have to and get the guy.. Everything else seem to workout when you get your guy..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TruePanther said:

With a superstar (presumed) coaching team in place, can they make it work with what we have in QBs? Use the draft capital to strengthen around them?

Andy Reid is a great coach but he still needs Mahomes.. You can be a great coach but you still need the talent and we don’t have that on this roster..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Oh, now you're suggesting that Hondo doesn't know the Raiders? That's bullshit and you know it. Are you suggesting that Rapp Sheet doesn't know what he's talking about either? Come on, dude. Plaschke got it wrong, and anyone paying attention knows it.

And, at the same time you are suggesting SI, the LA Times, and several others don't know what they are talking about.  So, pick your poison.

Mark Davis is one of the least wealthy owners in the NFL, he is paying Gruden to sit on the sidelines, and would then be paying McDiptstick to join him.  Nobody knows for sure what these two contracts equate to, but Gruden was reported to be around $10M a year and McDiptstick was making $4M a year as the OC for the Pats and reported to be making "substantially more" to go to the Raiders. 

So, the guy who is somewhere between the 29th and 32nd richest owner (including the Packers who are technically owned by no one in particular), could be paying out $18-$20M a year for guys no longer coaching plus, say, another $5M to whoever would be. 

But, the problem is not simply overall wealth (which for Davis may look big to us, even though he is relatively low on the NFL totem pole), but cash flow.  How much of his non-liquid wealth is he willing to convert to liquid wealth in order to get rid of yet another coach he should not have hired in the first place?

It saved Davis money to let Carr go, while at the same time it would cost a bundle to let the HC go.  Even if he winds up paying the same money he would have paid Carr to others on the roster, it is still neutral.

Given McDipstick's history and antics as a HC, anybody suggesting having him in that position creates stability is fooling themselves. 

But, believe what and who you will.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Stroud is a Fields clone??? Really? That’s like comparing Tua and Hurts because they played at the same school. They are two completely different players. Stroud can become anywhere from Goff to Burrow (who our new QB coach has already compared him to). You would be better off comparing AR to Fields. 

No Levis and AR aren’t ready to start week 1 unless we just want them to take their lumps like Buffalo did with Allen. That’s actually the norm for rookie QBs. Week 1 starters that look solid are extremely rare. It’s another reason why waiting another year isn’t the best idea. You are typically 2 plus years away from great QB play when you draft one.

Ok, we are just going to disagree on this.  I ain't changing your mind and you certainly aren't changing mine.  Again, the urgency of this fan base is shading the glasses of this QB class more and more rosy.  The Burrow comparison did elicit a chuckle, I must confess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...