Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go for Carr hard and save #9 pick?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

What’s the bust rate on QBs in the 2nd, 3rd and so on and so on.……..

 

 

 

 

Dont worry I already know and so do you..

Pretty high and again, I...don't...care.  FYI, busts generally only apply to first rounders...little technicality there. I want to sit out this draft--entirely--at QB, but would be okay with a slight move up for one of the top two.   You are saying the first rounders are better than 3rd rounders, up is not down and cats don't like dogs or some silly thing like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Pretty high and again, I...don't...care.  FYI, busts generally only apply to first rounders...little technicality there. I want to sit out this draft--entirely--at QB, but would be okay with a slight move up for one of the top two.   You are saying the first rounders are better than 3rd rounders, up is not down and cats don't like dogs or some silly thing like that.

Higher then the bust rate of 1st round QBs but you already know that.. 

I don’t think the team is sitting out this year QB class and made the right preparations to make a swing.. So I’m cool with whatever decision they make .. 

I’m saying water is wet and fish can swim and generally 1st round QBS have more success then drafting a QB in any other round and drafting and developing your QB gives you a better chance at consistency then retreads…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, frankw said:

We aren't solving the QB dilemma in trades or free agency. You swing when you get the chance. Reich didn't put this staff together to waste a season waiting on a QB next year. That's not how you run a franchise.

I mean it’s painfully obvious we are getting a qb this year.  I mean the staff he put together is pretty telling that is the case.   Now who it is and how we get him should be the conversation not talking about 2024 or free agency.   We are 100% drafting a guy this year.   

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean it’s painfully obvious we are getting a qb this year.  I mean the staff he put together is pretty telling that is the case.   Now who it is and how we get him should be the conversation not talking about 2024 or free agency.   We are 100% drafting a guy this year.   

Especially if the rumors are true that the Colts QBs weren't exactly Reich's choosing. No way he took this job to get stuck with Sam Darnold or Matt Corral. We have an owner who desperately wants a QB. We have a coach who couldn't get over the hump at his last stop because he didn't get a QB.

If we don't do something aggressive at QB I'll be shocked. I just hope we make the right call while doing it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What defines a bust?   That’s a pretty ambiguous chart

Never got a Pro Bowl nod AND started less than 50 games (roughly 3 season).  I mean losing the starting gig in 3 years should be enough, but they added no Pro Bowls and as seen this year, it's not too difficult to get to the Pro Bowl--you just can't completely suck apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Especially if the rumors are true that the Colts QBs weren't exactly Reich's choosing. No way he took this job to get stuck with Sam Darnold or Matt Corral. We have an owner who desperately wants a QB. We have a coach who couldn't get over the hump at his last stop because he didn't get a QB.

If we don't do something aggressive at QB I'll be shocked. I just hope we make the right call while doing it 

So if Tepper is desperate, then he'll go sign Carr to 30 million. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's easy to say that we (or rather Tepper) will hopefully be aggressive in going after a QB.

But it's always easier said than done, especially when there really isn't anyone that is available that can fulfill that "difference-maker" moniker. 

 

If there is, then please someone (anyone) provide a list of these AVAILABLE-TO-ACQUIRE "difference-makers".    Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Well is there a difference maker for him to go after?

'Cause I'm not seeing any one listed. (Maybe I missed the post)

Jmo there are 2 in this draft and I would take a shot on a younger guy with more physical talent with this staff then 32 year old and 30 million + wanting Carr..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Jmo there are 2 in this draft and I would take a shot on a younger guy with more physical talent with this staff then 32 year old and 30 million + wanting Carr..

I was referring to ready-to-perform QBs, not rookie wet-behind-the-ear ones just coming into the league, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

I was referring to ready-to-perform QBs, not rookie wet-behind-the-ear ones just coming into the league, though. 

I would still go for Levi’s or Richardson with this staff over Carr… I’ve seen his calling and it’s maybe a playoff win here or there and still looking for a QB.. While paying him way more money then a rookie..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...