Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears have been approached by multiple teams for #1 Pick and are leaning towards trading the pick away per Adam Schefter


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

At least he knows that sounds crazy. A very bold career deciding move. If Young isn’t what you think and Fields keeps developing ouch… There goes your career as a GM. 

I mean the other way around hurts too… this gm and HC didn’t draft Fields. Landing the number 1 pick as a GM only happens once (if it happens) … so you have to make the decision that promotes yourself and the team the best. If there are back door convos between him and the bears HC about not believing fields is their QB (no one has had a closer look than them) then it’s not going to be as bold we think.

 

pure speculation. I’m just saying that if they made that decision there would Be data to support it. The money piece is a good point as well but that’s more auxiliary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

At least he knows that sounds crazy. A very bold career deciding move. If Young isn’t what you think and Fields keeps developing ouch… There goes your career as a GM. 

So we passed on Fields, the Bears have the #1 pick and supposedly don't want to trade him to take either of these top 2 Qbs? And now if we want one we might have to trade a bag to them to grab one of them? Interesting to see how Fields vs Stroud/Young looks in a couple years. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Asaria said:

Frankly don't care what the "Math" says and I'm tired of first round picks in all honesty. Did Luke ever lead us to a ring?(Bless his soul), did Jordan Gross ever lead us to a ring? Did Vernon Butler ever lead us to a ring? The answer is NO.

I'm ready to trade up in the draft, 3-4 first round picks doesn't matter to me. I'm tired of the same sh*t every year, and if it doesn't work, then f*ck it, we tried atleast.

Math trumps your desperation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He thinks Young is the next Patrick Mahomes. If other GMs actually thought this the Bears phones would be blowing up. It’s easy to hype your guy up and say sensational things like “the next Mahomes” when your career isn’t on the line. The Bears aren’t risking it and rightfully so. Get more picks and address one of their other 1000 needs.

Bryce Young is a better player than Mahomes was coming out in the draft.  Period.  He has played great in much bigger games and has consistently been the best player on the field.  This will continue.  

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Falcons going after Lamar.

 

If that doesn't happen they can get AR in the draft.

We probably would have won 3 more games last year if we had AR straight up. It's hard to throw more picks than the Darnold/PJ/Walker trio. Probably would have rushed for 200-300 yards a game lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...