Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine Drills: Quarterback Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

His timing isn't off though. The ball is showing up right when it's supposed to. That's the only timing that actually matters.

I dont believe you are correct here. However, I really dont want to go into a back and forth over a QB that wont get drafted before the 5th round bc of lack of talent and mechanics at his position. You and I obviously study the position from a completely different perspective. So lets just leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Trying to determine if this is going to be some long term thing where it would be best to just put you on block or mute or if this is temporary and you’ll get back to being a better contributor here. 

By all means put me on ignore or block or whatever makes you feel better.  If my comment offended you then so be it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

It's not odd. That fact you are placing judgment on how good they are or will be on a few drills is what's odd. And that fact that I mentioned it upset you two is what's odd. 

This dudes making it sound like we said Stet had a few good drills that meant we were saying he’s going to be a better pro or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

I enjoy the combine and it's good to discuss and go back and forth but in general throwing in shorts doesn't mean much. I would still roll the dice on Richardson at this point in time though if it came down to it.

True, but it does make some teams go back and watch film on prospects they didn't think much of. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont believe you are correct here. However, I really dont want to go into a back and forth over a QB that wont get drafted before the 5th round bc of lack of talent and mechanics at his position. You and I obviously study the position from a completely different perspective. So lets just leave it at that.

Not sure why you're being so testy. We can agree to disagree I'm far from a Bennett fan boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's not odd. That fact you are placing judgment on how good they are or will be on a few drills is what's odd. And that fact that I mentioned it upset you two is what's odd. 

It's definitely odd being in a thread about QB Combine drills attributing arguments that I haven't seen made. We're literally just talking about how guys are performing in the QB drills in the QB drills thread.

These drills are far from the end all be all of these QB evaluations. I think everyone is well aware of that. But it's March and there's nothing else football related to talk about. I fully understand if you don't care but why bother posting here about that? Let the rest of us discuss the things there are to discuss

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure why you're being so testy. We can agree to disagree I'm far from a Bennett fan boy.

I wasnt attempting to be testy, just stating that this debate could be endless bc it is based off of differing perspectives. I really just wanted to close the discussion on this topic so we could move to AR and CJ.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL 
    • I have been doing a bunch of mock drafts and this one interesting scenario popped up that made me question myself. I know our needs edge, mike, OT,wr, and secondary. This situation Love fell to 19 and I know we don't NEED a RB. But if we stay out at 19(I don't think we do) I don't think I could say no to love. If this team really believes in BPA and love is there at 19 who realistic is better than love at this point? Love is a top 5 talent, there is no akeem messador or Caleb banks or Kenyon Sadiq type player I think I would rather have than love. He would make Bryce life much easier, he's a homerun threat on a offense that lacks speed. He's essentially modern day Reggie bush to me and I think he could play alongside Chubba on passing down potentially as a slot and be the speed threat we really need. I think it's a bit crazy but I would be willing to wait til the second round and see who falls at edge(I think we land Chubb or loyd in free agency) maybe chase TJ parker if he falls or Rodriguez or golliday in the second/third. What say you?
    • They have also beaten the Rockets, Lakers, Spurs, and Nuggets... 
×
×
  • Create New...