Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine Drills: Quarterback Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

AR and Stroud throwing in the same group shows how far AR still needs to go as a passer. AR isn't going #1.


AR needs to sit for a year and work on mechanics etc. 

I don’t know where he’ll go, but I doubt he goes to someone who needs a starter this year. The lions could be the destination.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I got a crush on this entire TE class.  There's like 10-12 guys that would be our starter with our current roster.  

T1: Mayer, Kincaid

T2: Washington, Musgrave, LaPorta, Kraft

T3: Schoonmaker, Kuntz, Spann-Ford, D Allen, Whyle

I view all of them above Ian and Tremble.  Tremble still has mad potential but not a premiere catching TE type.  This is a seriously stacked class.   

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

Yeah I got a crush on this entire TE class.  There's like 10-12 guys that would be our starter with our current roster.  

T1: Mayer, Kincaid

T2: Washington, Musgrave, LaPorta, Kraft

T3: Schoonmaker, Kuntz, Spann-Ford, D Allen, Whyle

I view all of them above Ian and Tremble.  Tremble still has mad potential but not a premiere catching TE type.  This is a seriously stacked class.   

I love this class.. This class is the year to get 1 even over WR..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Don’t forget the 6’6 250lbs and biggest hands in the TE class

No one has stickier hands than Kincaid though.  That boy is amazing. I'd be targeting him somehow.  I'm sure he reminds our staff of Goedert who they are quite familiar with.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

No one has stickier hands than Kincaid though.  That boy is amazing. I'd be targeting him somehow.  I'm sure he reminds our staff of Goedert who they are quite familiar with.  

Agree but the blocking size mismatches are in Washington favor every Sunday..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...