Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine Drills: Quarterback Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I hope he sprays it around like crazy because right now it looks like we might have to go all the way to #1 to get him at this point.

I am changing my stance that there will not be 4 guys in the top 10 but damn it’s looking like it now.   What ar as done today is pretty nuts.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I worry that Levis is coming off like a jerk--can he be a good teammate?  Does not seem humble or ready to learn--but this is a meat market.

 

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I wasn't gonna say anything about that because I'm sure I already come off to many as a Levis hater, but yeah I got that vibe from him too

CJ, Levis, and now AR have all said some extremely cocky poo over the last 24 hours... its either the mentality agents are telling these kids to have... or they indeed have ego issues.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

 

CJ, Levis, and now AR have all said some extremely cocky poo over the last 24 hours... its either the mentality agents are telling these kids to have... or they indeed have ego issues.

At the time end of the day to be a great QB in the NFL you gotta walk that tight rope between confident and cocky. I haven't seen any of these guys come across as bad as Josh Rosen or Brock Osweiler. Those are the only two guys I've ever written off as surefire busts simply based on how off the charts cocky they came across in the pre-draft process.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

 

CJ, Levis, and now AR have all said some extremely cocky poo over the last 24 hours... its either the mentality agents are telling these kids to have... or they indeed have ego issues.

They MUST be highly confident and self assured, that scares less confident folk and can come off as ego or arrogance. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...