Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much is too much to trade?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

The reason I ask.  While I like Young.  I love Stroud as well.

and seeing Daniel Jeremiah saying Stroud had one of the best sessions he’s seen at the combine.

 

We’ve also seen our new QB coach on record of comparing Stroud to Burrow.
 

 We also heard in press conferences recently where Reich said McCown has sat down and talked QBs with Reich.

 

 

Now as far as trade

We heard the rumors the last 2 years with the Watson saga.  That we could offer up to a ridiculous 3 1sts and some defensive starters like Burns, Brown, Chinn.

I don’t know what the final offer got to from us.  And we’ll never know.  But we do know the thing that made Tepper pull out was the $$$ he was wanting.  With Stroud, it’s the opposite.  That rookie deal is something that adds to the attraction 

 

Now knowing that we have a 

top 5-10 young edge rusher (we can have that argument elsewhere), and I am certain he will be extended.

we have a stable big interior DL guy in Brown

we have a #1 shut down CB

we have a #1 WR

we have a good young LT along with a fairly good Young OL with one of the top OL coaches in the NFL.

We have a elite staff on paper.  With a good track record with QBs.  Creating a perfect cacoon for a young QB.

 

So if our staff feels Stroud is a Burrow level QB.

 

How much is Too much picks to trade for him?

 

Now I know the other argument of other holes.  But those holes aren’t at big foundation pieces like I listed above.  And this is where that Franchise QB on the rookie deal comes in handy.  Allowing more flexibility in FA to fill those other filler pieces.  
 

So how much is to much?

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a massive risk. It's basically an all-in type of move. If you take the big swing and get a big hit you'll never regret it. But if you take the big swing and whiff hard it's gonna really hurt watching some other team make those high picks while you're still sitting there desperately wanting a QB.

My body is ready though. We've seen where playing it safe has gotten us. Identify a guy. Take the swing. It's very rare to have a team sitting at #1 not desperately needing a QB.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's just a massive risk. It's basically an all-in type of move. If you take the big swing and get a big hit you'll never regret it. But if you take the big swing and whiff hard it's gonna really hurt watching some other team make those high picks while you're still sitting there desperately wanting a QB.

My body is ready though. We've seen where playing it safe has gotten us. Identify a guy. Take the swing. It's very rare to have a team sitting at #1 not desperately needing a QB.

It is a big risk.  But it’s not like we’re taking one with a empty roster.  This is the same roster that was a quarter away from winning the division with Sam Darnold, PJ Walker, and Baker rotating in at QB.  With the division getting a couple games head start with Rhule starting g the year as HC.

 

You need a top QB in this sport if your goal is to compete for championships (and I’m not talking Division titles).  The only way your getting one of those is licking you and getting a top 2 pick in a good QB class.  Or taking a big swing.  The days of Aaron Rodger falling to the the bottom of the 1st are gone.  It’s too thirsty of a league for QBs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

It is a big risk.  But it’s not like we’re taking one with a empty roster.  This is the same roster that was a quarter away from winning the division with Sam Darnold, PJ Walker, and Baker rotating in at QB.  With the division getting a couple games head start with Rhule starting g the year as HC.

 

You need a top QB in this sport if your goal is to compete for championships (and I’m not talking Division titles).  The only way your getting one of those is licking you and getting a top 2 pick in a good QB class.  Or taking a big swing.  The days of Aaron Rodger falling to the the bottom of the 1st are gone.  It’s too thirsty of a league for QBs.

50cd2a08-2446-4158-a729-0e96d02b7d30_tex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, toldozer said:

If we can get there by giving up this whole draft and someone like Chinn I'd do it. Otherwise I'd rather go with brisett or darnold with corral this year and go bpa at 9. Or move up to 5 for both 2nds this year and get AR or stroud

Then what do you do next year? I think teams are going to be very aggressive this year because there's good QBs available and deals to potentially be made. I think they're all working under the assumption that Drake Maye and Caleb Williams are the top two picks next year and there's gonna be no trading for those picks.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

The only way you’re getting one of those is licking you and getting a top 2 pick in a good QB class.  Or taking a big swing.  The days of Aaron Rodger falling to the the bottom of the 1st are gone.

That’s FOMO and desperation talking. That’s simply not the case. 
 

Hopefully our front office keeps a level head. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ncfan said:

It is a big risk.  But it’s not like we’re taking one with a empty roster.  This is the same roster that was a quarter away from winning the division with Sam Darnold, PJ Walker, and Baker rotating in at QB.  With the division getting a couple games head start with Rhule starting g the year as HC.

 

You need a top QB in this sport if your goal is to compete for championships (and I’m not talking Division titles).  The only way your getting one of those is licking you and getting a top 2 pick in a good QB class.  Or taking a big swing.  The days of Aaron Rodger falling to the the bottom of the 1st are gone.  It’s too thirsty of a league for QBs.

Brock Purdy would like a word. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, toldozer said:

If we can get there by giving up this whole draft and someone like Chinn I'd do it. Otherwise I'd rather go with brisett or darnold with corral this year and go bpa at 9. Or move up to 5 for both 2nds this year and get AR or stroud

My original post was regarding Stroud not Young.  And I don’t think we get to 1 for Young.  This is about moving up to 3 or 2 (if the bears move with the Texans)

If you don’t move to 3 and get one.  What’s the plan?  Bpa at 9 and roll with Darnold.  Then what’s the plan going forward?  Because you will be picking 22 range next year as Scott Fitterer said.  And if you think the price to move from 9 is a lot.  What do you think it’ll be to move from outside the top 20?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

That’s FOMO and desperation talking. That’s simply not the case. 
 

Hopefully our front office keeps a level head. 

How is it?

you saying this isn’t a QB thirsty league. I’d love to see the data to prove otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...