Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Didn’t We Tank


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

We did tank.  We traded CMC after firing Rhule.  That’s a tanking attempt by a front office.  

Players still play.  Coaches still coach.  They still care about their futures….which isn’t tied or viewed specifically to Carolina’s long term future

If we wanted to guarantee the tank we should have never fired Rhule. Sure the season would have been miserable, but we'd still have the 1st pick and probably 3 comps because the league felt sorry for the fans for not being OOU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If we wanted to guarantee the tank we should have never fired Rhule. Sure the season would have been miserable, but we'd still have the 1st pick and probably 3 comps because the league felt sorry for the fans for not being OOU. 

That’s probably true.  Trade CMC and keep Rhule.  

but ego of how foolish they were looking finally kicked in.  So I get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh we weren't going to change the players they wanted to win. But I will chuckle at the holier than thou fans who attacked anyone that said those meaningless wins were so important. We won some games with Sam Darnold. It cost us DJ Moore. Never again. Get him and PJ Walker tf out of the Carolinas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

We did tank.  We traded CMC after firing Rhule.  That’s a tanking attempt by a front office.  

Players still play.  Coaches still coach.  They still care about their futures….which isn’t tied or viewed specifically to Carolina’s long term future

you will never convince me firing Rhule = tanking

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What were we gonna do? Promise Steve Wilks a job if he went along with doing something he was already suing the league over?

I've been hugely against trading up to #1 because of what I feared we'd have to give up.

This wasn't anywhere near that bad.

Yep. When I heard, I expected worse 

much worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...