Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Vonn Bell


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, KillerKat said:

Our new DC just said we are going to be a base 3-4 defense. He will actually see the field less if he stays. Woods, Bell, Chinn are all SSs. We need a FS somewhere. Woods just got a new deal, so I doubt he goes anywhere and most likely to move to FS with the acquisition of Bell. Chinn doesnt fit the 3-4 and we have too many SSs on the team now.

How often does a modem nfl defense go heavy on CB packages and how often does a team on average line up in 3-4 base…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

If we were going to be a hybrid, Evero wouldve said so but he didnt.

Lol what did you take from his interviews? That we would be a 3-4 defense only? 

Modern innovating defensive coordinators use multiple fronts, and looks. Players like Chinn are extremely valuable because he can do so much for you as a coverage or in the box player. He will confuse the hell out of offenses and never leaves the field. Chinn can blitz, be great against the run, cover the slot, anything. 

https://www.footballstudyhall.com/platform/amp/2015/5/1/8528407/modern-defense-and-the-2-4-5-vs-the-3-3-5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

If we were going to be a hybrid, Evero wouldve said so but he didnt.

"Yeah, Ejiro’s been 3-4,” he replied. “It’ll be a base 3-4 scheme. But when we get in sub, it’s really multiple. It’s really multiple. There’s four-down, three-down, five-down. It’ll all depend on how Ejiro and the defensive staff wanna take advantage of our players’ strengths. We’ll be very multiple. But in our base defense, we’ll be 3-4"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Not a bad deal, $7mil a year

I think the Chinn angle is undertalked about. I mean day one and they sign a safety?!?!? Chinn and his huge neck, better buckle up and get to making a difference.....this is his contract year too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...