Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Ricardson Board Work with Steve Mariucci


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, so seeing as how our finalists for the QB position have been narrowed down to Stroud or Richardson, I stumbled across this video that I don't think many huddlers have seen. 

So from 0:00 to 5:35 is pretty much the interview. After that it's a repeat. I liked the way he diagrammed the play, and just was overall fun to learn about him. One thing that was interesting to me though was that he said he had little to no familiarity with the West Coast Offense. Not sure if that's what we're running or not but I think definitely something of note. 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Richardson but he lacks basic QB fundamentals.  Hes a project qb that will take awhile to develop.  He has all the physical ability, he is coachable but he hasnt played that much football especially in college.  He needs time that I doubt management and the fan base are willing to give him.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

I like Richardson but he lacks basic QB fundamentals.  Hes a project qb that will take awhile to develop.  He has all the physical ability, he is coachable but he hasnt played that much football especially in college.  He needs time that I doubt management and the fan base are willing to give him.

"That's what this staff is for."

I like Richardson enough that if the staff likes him enough to take him #1 overall, I won't be chafed. Means they have a plan.

However if it comes out that it was an owners pick or something, wellllllllllll...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I do not know. Richardson and Heaner was the only 2 that they have shown so far. 

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

I'm sure it's edited for time but what content is kept or cut is never discussed.  I doubt Mooch has a vest interest in making these guys look better than they really are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I've always wondered if these were chopped up just for the fans. They wouldnt show a failed QB, or maybe they do but chop it up to look like they nailed it. Obviously players' agents wouldnt allow it to be shown.

Depends on the integrity of who's producing it honestly.  I'd be willing to a bet a QB who fails one of these would gather more views than someone who succeeds, but showing it does nothing but satiate the fans because scouts/gms already know what they need to know.

Edited by Rags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm sure it's edited for time but what content is kept or cut is never discussed.  I doubt Mooch has a vest interest in making these guys look better than they really are. 

if he gets paid to do it.... Im sure he has plenty of interest. AR aside, these guys get paid for amplify their opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...