Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson Pro Day


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, rayzor said:

It doesn't sound like they are interested in drafting someone they can't start right away. They are priming this team to win now.

If they draft him, the goal will be to start him day 1. Dalton is there in case he's not ready, but I think they won't be wanting to let him sit a year. They'd come up with an offense built around what he can and can't do right now and develop him as they go, adding things to the offense as he progresses.

Yep and trying to win now could bite them in the backside. Any rookie QB can bust despite the coaches and system. They would be better off to use this first year to make sure everyone has their feet under them and make sure the rookie QB can handle the game/pressure of being an NFL starter. Then, go win now in year 2. But it seems the patience isn't there for that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

53% is abysmal for a college QB. We’re not talking about splitting hairs between high completion %

Again, completion percentage is not just about the QB. Richardson didn't have good receivers in the first place and by the end of the season was throwing to the guys at the bottom of the depth chart. And yeah, Richardson would let his footwork go at times. The dude needs coaching and a better supporting cast.

I saw another post where you mentioned Levis. The difference between the two is that Richardson was a first year starter while Levis was a 5th year multi year starter. Levis should have been a near complete work instead of still being raw compared to Richardson's lump of clay waiting to be molded.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Again, completion percentage is not just about the QB. Richardson didn't have good receivers in the first place and by the end of the season was throwing to the guys at the bottom of the depth chart. And yeah, Richardson would let his footwork go at times. The dude needs coaching and a better supporting cast.

I saw another post where you mentioned Levis. The difference between the two is that Richardson was a first year starter while Levis was a 5th year multi year starter. Levis should have been a near complete work instead of still being raw compared to Richardson's lump of clay waiting to be molded.

I mean if you’re going to post at least be accurate. Levis was a two year starter at Kentucky. Never started at Penn State. Let’s just hope we stay away from both and take Young or Stroud 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Yep and trying to win now could bite them in the backside. Any rookie QB can bust despite the coaches and system. They would be better off to use this first year to make sure everyone has their feet under them and make sure the rookie QB can handle the game/pressure of being an NFL starter. Then, go win now in year 2. But it seems the patience isn't there for that.

i think that Young and Stroud are both good to go as a starter on day 1, or at least it seems they would be.

AR...i think it depends on how he was used. Might be best to have him in situationally and eventually in the first season. he gets compared to Cam a lot, but Cam was ready to go day 1 for sure. that's just not AR. not yet. i think the intelligence is there for sure. it's just the playing experience he's lacking.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I mean if you’re going to post at least be accurate. Levis was a two year starter at Kentucky. Never started at Penn State. Let’s just hope we stay away from both and take Young or Stroud 

Multi is more than one. Two is more than one. What's not accurate about that? The one thing I was wrong about was him being a fifth year senior. I got him confused with the other older QBs. Levis only played four years in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Yep and trying to win now could bite them in the backside. Any rookie QB can bust despite the coaches and system. They would be better off to use this first year to make sure everyone has their feet under them and make sure the rookie QB can handle the game/pressure of being an NFL starter. Then, go win now in year 2. But it seems the patience isn't there for that.

Non of the contracts have been win now contracts..

Now going and getting an OBJ type diva would suggest that but not so far. At least that's the analysis I've seen so far regarding our signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Multi is more than one. Two is more than one. What's not accurate about that? The one thing I was wrong about was him being a fifth year senior. I got him confused with the other older QBs. Levis only played four years in college.

He was in college for 5 years. Redshirt freshman year at Penn state in 2018. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...