Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson Pro Day


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

you can't teach speed and size....  the rest can be taught by Reich, Dalton, Caldwell, Brown

 

Would not be surprised at the least AR15 is the pick

Young and Stroud would make me feel good about the QB future right away. 
Richardson would have me concerned and worried from the get-go we just wasted 2 first round picks on a QB that is rawer than I like my steak. 
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

Yep and trying to win now could bite them in the backside. Any rookie QB can bust despite the coaches and system. They would be better off to use this first year to make sure everyone has their feet under them and make sure the rookie QB can handle the game/pressure of being an NFL starter. Then, go win now in year 2. But it seems the patience isn't there for that.

Any rookie qb we bring in is surrounded with a very good offense. Especially getting sanders, an rb who can do it all, including running the read option which AR is very good at. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Any rookie qb we bring in is surrounded with a very good offense. Especially getting sanders, an rb who can do it all, including running the read option which AR is very good at. 

I get what you're saying and I hope the offense will be very good but after all these bad years, I'm not counting the chickens until they hatch.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Any rookie qb we bring in is surrounded with a very good offense. Especially getting sanders, an rb who can do it all, including running the read option which AR is very good at. 

I think 'very good' is a stretch. We've gone from the 32nd WR corps to somewhere in the bottom 10-15, but at least the new QB has a chance now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Would you consider Lance a bust if he hasn’t really played much at all?

I'd say there's a reason for that (and not just the injury)

There might not be enough info to call him a bust yet but things don't seem to be trending in the right direction.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Young and Stroud would make me feel good about the QB future right away. 
Richardson would have me concerned and worried from the get-go we just wasted 2 first round picks on a QB that is rawer than I like my steak. 
 

You never take the guy who needs to be taught quarterbacking skills over the guy that already has them.

I don't care how big, strong or fast he is.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...