Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which player will benefit the most in the 3-4 Defense


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beyond Burns who is an obvious answer, Luvu 100% for me.

Wash State/Leach rotated him inside and outside in 2017.  He was a great asset for them, all over the field, in disguises, they were creative with him & he knows how to hunt the QB.  He's such a good piece to have moving forward.  

I think he's primed for a nice fluid role here.  ILB and OLB.  

Between him and Chinn being basically FLEX starters, it's just dependent on the package.  And we'll be in nickel more than 3-4.  

Shaq, Luvu, Burns and Chinn all standing in the box is what's up.  You have two outside corners, two deep, & the 3 man front of Brown-Tuttle-Williams.    

And if we don't land an EDGE in R2-3, watch out for Haynes.  The dude has improved every year and I feel like he could really have a chance to make an impact.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two separate issues at play that should help most of our defense.  Some will benefit from the switch to a 3-4, and I would perhaps put Burns at the top of that, but as the discussion has pointed out, there are several candidates.

Then there is a coaching staff who will hopefully assess the talent's strengths and weaknesses and put them in the best position to succeed whether it is a 3-4, 4-3, 5-2, 7-0.

Honestly, I could care less about the 3-4 switch.  The second change has me a lot more pumped up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone can benefit from a change to a 3-4 if it is aggressive in style. Being in a 3-4 or a 4-3 as a base defense only 30% of the time means that most of the time they will be in something else. So the way they play and various coverages will determine who shines more than the base defense we employ. Fanzio's version is very aggressive with frequent blitzing through the A gaps which benefits ILB sack stats as much as OLBs.  Coverages matter. Press man coverage might benefit Horn more than a cover 3 shell in terms of his effectiveness.  And if Chinn is playing safety in press man on a TE he stays closer to the line than if they were in cover 4 for example. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said that way back because it is true. Teams aren’t trading what appears to be a can’t miss prospect.    In an extremely rare scenario like they have an established QB and maybe got the pick in a trade. Sort of like the Bears but with a better incumbent. If they’s have had someone significantly better than Fields they might have cashed in. 
    • So you're saying you'd still go back and take the inferior talents, just because you think they fit with Bryce better, a player who is more likely than not, to no longer be a Panther next year? That's just crazy to say, wanting to have a worse player because you think they fit better with your awful QB is just dumb.  You take the best players, if your existing players then aren't good enough, you replace them later. It's crazy that there are still people with this take after they've seen what T-Mac can do for us in just 5 games so far.
    • I have seen Bryce make some outstanding throws but what he is up against is even when the WRs get a little separation, that tightens up while the ball is in the air. By degrees depending on the distance. Not as critical on the short stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...