Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud Film Breakdown Megathread


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will just go ahead and say what I have thought for a while.  CJ Stroud played from a Mr Clean pocket in every game he played outside of Georgia.  He had ridiculous weapons and an OL that let him sit back and be very comfortable.  He has a bust factor and isn’t nearly the finished product people are describing.

His team lost nearly all of his “show me” games.  He is going to struggle if he goes to a bad team.  He has never seen that scenario in his life

  • Flames 3
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I will just go ahead and say what I have thought for a while.  CJ Stroud played from a Mr Clean pocket in every game he played outside of Georgia.  He had ridiculous weapons and an OL that let him sit back and be very comfortable.  He has a bust factor and isn’t nearly the finished product people are describing.

His team lost nearly all of his “show me” games.  He is going to struggle if he goes to a bad team.  He has never seen that scenario in his life

So you are saying Young is a god and Stroud is a 100% bust. Nice bias attack on Stroud

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

So you are saying Young is a god and Stroud is a 100% bust. Nice bias attack on Stroud

I calls em likes I sees em.  If Stroud goes to the Texans he will bust miserably.  If he can’t have a clean pocket he is going to struggle mightily 

  • Beer 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don’t like how manufactured Stroud is with his game.  Everything was so well structured and made so easy for him.  If you remove the Georgia game he would be completely unproven.  
 

No one can convince me Young didn’t face higher competition week in and week out.  Young always played great regardless of the venue or stage.  Stroud did it 1 game and his team lost the game.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I personally don’t like how manufactured Stroud is with his game.  Everything was so well structured and made so easy for him.  If you remove the Georgia game he would be completely unproven.  
 

No one can convince me Young didn’t face higher competition week in and week out.  Young always played great regardless of the venue or stage.  Stroud did it 1 game and his team lost the game.

Talk that talk bro. BY9 til we expire

  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

I will just go ahead and say what I have thought for a while.  CJ Stroud played from a Mr Clean pocket in every game he played outside of Georgia.  He had ridiculous weapons and an OL that let him sit back and be very comfortable.  He has a bust factor and isn’t nearly the finished product people are describing.

His team lost nearly all of his “show me” games.  He is going to struggle if he goes to a bad team.  He has never seen that scenario in his life

He didn’t vs UM, twice ND 1st game last year and Penn state last year.. And They didn’t lose because of him.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stroud will be good where ever he goes.. He isn’t a mental midget he has battled hard times most his life and he has stepped up his game in big game.. He has worked hard to have a flawless passing structure from his legs to his upper body.. He is tough can read defenses accurate as fug and rarely makes bad decisions or mistakes.. You call him structure because he has worked hard to make it look that way..

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Stroud will be good where ever he goes.. He isn’t a mental midget he has battled hard times most his life and he has stepped up his game in big game.. He has worked hard to have a flawless passing structure from his legs to his upper body.. He is tough can read defenses accurate as fug and rarely makes bad decisions or mistakes.. You call him structure because he has worked hard to make it look that way..

He does make bad decisions. Fortunately for him, college defenses aren't pro defenses. So while he throws a pass into double coverage and the safety mistimes the break on the receiver for what would be a pick (maybe even a pick 6), he looks like he is making a great play. But throw that same ball on Sunday? Reality will hit hard. And I don't think he has shown that he knows how to adapt his game to veer too far off script. The Georgia game was the exception, but even then he left plays on the field. And he played as hard as he did in that game because it had real weight to it. But I don't see that as being a weekly effort.

He is robotic. And he plays the game like he is on auto pilot. He doesn't willingly or easily adapt to turbulence. 

Edited by XClown1986
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XClown1986 said:

He does make bad decisions. Fortunately for him, college defenses aren't pro defenses. So while he throws a pass into double coverage and the safety mistimes the break on the receiver for what would be a pick (maybe even a pick 6), he looks like he is making a great play. But throw that same ball on Sunday? Reality will hit hard. And I don't think he has shown that he knows how to adapt his game to veer too far off script. The Georgia game was the exception, but even then he left plays on the field. And he played as hard as he did in that game because it had real weight to it. But I don't see that as being a weekly effort. 

12 ints in 2 years says you’re wrong.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Ok. We'll see. The NFL isn't the Big 10. And Ohio State quarterbacks have continued to learn that the hard way.

 

Neither is SEC, ACc, PAC 20, MAC, Mountain west, Whatever Norte Dame is doing none are the NFL.. And I promise you IF Harrison JR was available “the nfl isn’t the big 10 wouldn’t come out your keyboard”.. 

Lastly if we’re doing the dumbass OState QB thing then where is QB U then.. Bama, Clemson, Texas tech, ??? Hell BiG blue got the greatest of all time as a graduate.. So Macarthy should definitely be a target right??

lmao

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Neither is SEC, ACc, PAC 20, MAC, Mountain west, Whatever Norte Dame is doing none are the NFL.. And I promise you IF Harrison JR was available “the nfl isn’t the big 10 wouldn’t come out your keyboard”.. 

Lastly if we’re doing the dumbass OState QB thing then where is QB U then.. Bama, Clemson, Texas tech, ??? Hell BiG blue got the greatest of all time as a graduate.. So Macarthy should definitely be a target right??

lmao

Easily ass hurt bro? Damn. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...