Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Betting odds have shifted


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

So the best qb doesn't throw the most beautiful ball then....how is he the best? What makes him better arm, or wait he took a test and did good

 

Unsolved Mysteries GIF by FILMRISE

Throwing a pretty ball is definitely a positive for qbs, but far from the #1 trait.  Heck, some of the strongest armed prettiest ball throwing prospects have been the biggest busts in recent memory.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ncfan said:

It’s almost as if it’s the Markets correcting themselves.  And the guy who they always had going 1 before we traded and the guy that most have the top guy is back as the betting favorite again.

And it would be a mistake to take a guy with average everything except a mental processing test he's been practicing for four years.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

So the best qb doesn't throw the most beautiful ball then....how is he the best? What makes him better arm, or wait he took a test and did good

 

Unsolved Mysteries GIF by FILMRISE

There’s plenty that goes into being a good QB other than just throwing the most beautiful ball. I’ve written a lot on why I like Bryce in plenty of threads and had lots of fun and enjoyable debates with people.

Clearly you aren’t looking for that though so poo away and I won’t waste my time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Staff answers to owner. Owner shows strong preference, is your boss, you are new here…. 
 

Otherwise I would trust them too, and be confident they don’t misevaluate the talent they are choosing from. Because some of this is just nuts. Number 1 overall.  Not at 16, 25, or even 9. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NAS said:

It was complete opposite just a week ago, but this coinides with the recent media rumors coming out about Nicole and David Tepper really being smitten by Bryce Young

I was afraid of this and it’s all the wrong reason to select him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ickmule said:

You shouldn’t. They haven’t proven anything yet and I’m not impressed with Reich’s history of coaching.  

Reich and McCown have played QB in the NFL.  Reich is a solid HC that was just praised by the NFC champ Eagles HC as the best football mind he has been around, he helped Foles win a Super Bowl and had Wentz playing at a MVP level before his injury.  Fitt was part of the staff that put together that Seahawks team that won with Russ.  You know Capers and Caldwell have even bigger resumes. 

Ok now your turn.  What makes you more qualified that this staff?  Or any other poster on here.  

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Reich and McCown have played QB in the NFL.  Reich is a solid HC that was just praised by the NFC champ Eagles HC as the best football mind he has been around, he helped Foles win a Super Bowl and had Wentz playing at a MVP level before his injury.  Fitt was part of the staff that put together that Seahawks team that won with Russ.  You know Capers and Caldwell have even bigger resumes. 

Ok now your turn.  What makes you more qualified that this staff?  Or any other poster on here.  

All of that does not make Him a winning head coach. I give no one credit or praise until they earn it. It’s only my opinion, but selecting Young will prove an error in judgment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ickmule said:

All of that does not make Him a winning head coach. I give no one credit or praise until they earn it. It’s only my opinion, but selecting Young will prove an error in judgment.  

He is 41-35-1 as a head coach. So yeah he is technically a winning head coach, even in with that terrible GM and changing QBs every year in Indy.  Again what are your credentials? 

Spoiler alert.... you don't have any.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

He is 41-35-1 as a head coach. So yeah he is technically a winning head coach, even in with that terrible GM and changing QBs every year in Indy.  Again what are your credentials? 

Spoiler alert.... you don't have any.

Oh, I have credentials….although none for NFL coaching or scouting.  So, technically I do have credentials.  Lol. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...