Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on Panthers #1 pick (no trade back)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Agreed.

 

If you really took the time to look at our WR's we are still in the bottom 5 of the league. Chark is probably our #1 based on talent. I say that as no disrespect to his game.

 

Now compare Chark to other #1 WR's around the league.

 

We still need another young WR. Hopefully we can get one. I wouldn't be shocked if we still looking around the league via trade for an upgrade as well.

Downs.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Now that we know Bryce Young is likely the pick.

 

Can we get this dude a legit young weapon to grow with?

 

No disrespect to Thielen he's aging, and Chark is on a 1yr deal with a injury prone history.

 

If we can get a young WR or TE he can grow with would be nice.

Easier said than done. That will likely take some draft capital, and honestly this WR class doesn't necessarily have any sure-fire beasts. If one of the WRs slides into the second, then maybe, otherwise we might be better off just going BPA. I think that could be a TE before it's a WR, but, then again, we need a pass rusher and an LB, so I don't know. The WR out of UT looks interesting. I doubt Quentin slides. Njigba is probably the surest WR in the draft, so he'll be long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I hope we do see someone as being "that guy". The guy we can't afford to gamble on missing out on. If that's Young, that's fine by me. Let's go!

Their jobs literally depend on it - I just hope they've not fallen in love with the off-the-field stuff when the on-the-field stuff is what's most important. 

Everyone in that Front Office is fired in two years if they get this pick wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Their jobs literally depend on it - I just hope they've not fallen in love with the off-the-field stuff when the on-the-field stuff is what's most important. 

Everyone in that Front Office is fired in two years if they get this pick wrong. 

Like you said, it's their jobs not mine. If this dude busts they're all gonna get fired and they know it. As such, let them pick the guy they want. If you don't trust them to identify the guy then A) you shouldn't have let them make the trade and B) you shouldn't have hired them to begin with.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Stroud has never been a elite prospect. Most of his hype came from people in this sub myself included. Stroud was never a better QB than Young. We just thought that his size would be a reason to draft him over Young long term. Also add the fact that Frank has never coached a QB in his system under 6'3. 

 

I think Young would go #1 regardless of the teams that need a QB at the top of the draft.

He was arguably a better QB this year - had better stats. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Stroud has never been a elite prospect. Most of his hype came from people in this sub myself included. Stroud was never a better QB than Young. We just thought that his size would be a reason to draft him over Young long term. Also add the fact that Frank has never coached a QB in his system under 6'3. 

 

I think Young would go #1 regardless of the teams that need a QB at the top of the draft.

Come on now. Stroud is still a great prospect. He is rated in the 90s right behind Young. If Houston passes on him someone will trade with Arz to get him at 3. I wouldn’t be surprised if Ind does it to prevent themselves from getting jumped.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Oline, yes. WR? Depends on if a better pass catching TE is available. Take the better playmaker regardless of if he plays WR or TE.

If the right TE is available I would accept this. We just need a legit chain mover. I don't know what their plans are for the position though. We signed Hurst and we have Tremble then Ian Thomas and his contract are still lingering. I know folks don't want to admit it but Fitterer was high on Ian leading to the contract extension he said so himself. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...