Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

But Bryce Young did good on a test...right??


Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I wonder why Haener isn't getting more hype?  He is only 1 point behind him tied with Burrow.

I mean.  The test isn’t 100 pct factor.  Just a piece of the pie.

 

But Haener is getting some rd 3 buzz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bryce haters and size cowards say they cant wait to see the board when we end up picking Stroud. If its anything like we've got the last few days with the reaction to Bryce being the favorite, I dont blame them its going to be entertaining as hell.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billy Goat said:

Different test. Fields scored high in the AIQ test, not the S2.

He is listed on the S2 with Brees, Mahomes, Allen, and Burrow as mid 90s.  It's funny how people think he has issues processing yet this test is showing the opposite.  Levis is right there at 93 so maybe we shouldn't be so against him as well...

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

I mean.  The test isn’t 100 pct factor.  Just a piece of the pie.

 

But Haener is getting some rd 3 buzz.

Yeah I was reading his weaknesses... 

https://thedraftnetwork.com/sr-prospect/jake-haener-d9059b47-4403-4237-bcdf-b79d00a69c48/

Overall, if Haener were bigger and stronger we would be talking about a sure-fire top-10 pick, but unfortunately, he is not. With his lack of high-end traits, it’s hard to see Haener ever being a top starter at the next level, but with his natural ability as a passer and the competitive toughness he displays, I would not be shocked to see him develop into a low-level starter who you can win with if you surround him with a good team. I would not bet against this player

*He is 6'0" 207 BTW

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

 

 

The S2 scores are not the selling point for Bryce Young over CJ….the tape is. It’s as simple as that. I’m happy with either one but I’ll trust our great coaching staff with an extreme amount of NFL experience both playing and coaching over the huddle or TC collins on twitter 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarPanthers89 said:

The S2 scores are not the selling point for Bryce Young over CJ….the tape is. It’s as simple as that. I’m happy with either one but I’ll trust our great coaching staff with an extreme amount of NFL experience both playing and coaching over the huddle or TC collins on twitter 

This tape?

or this one

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

The S2 scores are not the selling point for Bryce Young over CJ….the tape is. It’s as simple as that. I’m happy with either one but I’ll trust our great coaching staff with an extreme amount of NFL experience both playing and coaching over the huddle or TC collins on twitter 

Exactly.  People are overhyping this S2 test.  You can't brag about Young acing it and ignore Fields/Levis doing well but having processing issues.  Tape is the king when looking at these players.  Young has elite tape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

The Stroud Boys are going to whine an complain all the way to the draft.

The S2 is not the deciding factor.  The tape is.  Stroud has a 40% completion rate under pressure and is mostly a statue in the pocket. 

Stop spitting nonsense..

https://mobile.twitter.com/CraigStock8675/status/1638108163466485760

Fru6sWuWIAAUqM1.jpeg

Fru6sWsWwAAh6Ro.jpeg

Edited by PanthersGOATFan336
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
    • Cooter was a good dude for sure. 
    • We both been here about the same amount of time. Whatever happened to Livermush? I know Cooter passed aways years ago...and so many others?
×
×
  • Create New...