Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it time to take the Falcons seriously?


Ivory Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

And good players. Good Coaching only takes you so far. The same with good players. You need a good mix of both. 

I agree, but the players we have is who we have. We will have better, even or worse players than our opponents. Hopefully our coaching will win out. Coaching isn't just about coaching the game but relating to the players and getting to play above their potentials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

I agree, but the players we have is who we have. We will have better, even or worse players than our opponents. Hopefully our coaching will win out. Coaching isn't just about coaching the game but relating to the players and getting to play above their potentials.

 

Good Coaching can make decent players better. It cannot however, make bad players good.

 

Good players can win with bad coaching, but you need a poo ton of talent to do so.

 

I think you are undervaluing our talent level. But hey, there are a whole lot of Huddlers who are doing the same thing. That's fine and all. But, don't come running to me if we start winning games and have a good season and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Good Coaching can make decent players better. It cannot however, make bad players good.

 

Good players can win with bad coaching, but you need a poo ton of talent to do so.

 

I think you are undervaluing our talent level. But hey, there are a whole lot of Huddlers who are doing the same thing. That's fine and all. But, don't come running to me if we start winning games and have a good season and all.

"I think you are undervaluing our talent level. But hey, there are a whole lot of Huddlers who are doing the same thing. That's fine and all. But, don't come running to me if we start winning games and have a good season and all."

What in the sam hill are you talking about? Where do I elude to undervaluing our players. This is the NFL, the best football players in the world and no all of them aren't on the same level. But good Coaching can coach them to be better in our system, ie. Josh Norman. 

Come crying to you when we start winning. This my team, I'm expecting us to start winning. This is the most excited I've been about a season since Cam Newton. But this ain't a one man show no more. 

The Carolina Panthers are looking for legitimacy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherPhann89 said:

"I think you are undervaluing our talent level. But hey, there are a whole lot of Huddlers who are doing the same thing. That's fine and all. But, don't come running to me if we start winning games and have a good season and all."

What in the sam hill are you talking about? Where do I elude to undervaluing our players. This is the NFL, the best football players in the world and no all of them aren't on the same level. But good Coaching can coach them to be better in our system, ie. Josh Norman. 

Come crying to you when we start winning. This my team, I'm expecting us to start winning. This is the most excited I've been about a season since Cam Newton. But this ain't a one man show no more. 

The Carolina Panthers are looking for legitimacy...

 

You know what dude. I concur wholeheartedly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The joy of the NFL. is you never know from year to year. Almost any team has a chance if they catch lightning in a bottle.

The Falcons have done that twice in 1998 and 2016. But couldn't sustain success after those years.

That is why we N.F.L. fans keep watching and keep coming back. The NFL has the best product in all pro sports. What professional league can say that almost every team has a chance to win a championship every year. Only the NFL.

Most pro sports only have a handful of teams that can win a championship. But every year the N.F.L. can get one team that wasn't expected to be in the Super Bowl. What other professional league can say that?

The other leagues are more predictable. The NFL is not. That is why they are the number one sports league in America!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a fan this is the most I've been excited about the defense for 2 decades. Sure none of our acquisitions are world beaters sans Jessie Bates, but it's the sum of their parts that has me giddy. The DL added another 20 sack players, and we finally have that eraser on the back end we sorely lacked forever. I expect this defense to be at least middle of the pack in points given up.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I like Pro football  better than College football is this--in college, Sabin wins because Sabin gets better players.  In the NFL, the players are pretty even.  Coaching matters.  Football IQ matters, technique matters, free agency matters, the draft matters, chemistry matters.  The general manager and capologist matter about as much as the coaches and scouts.  Winning is such a complex formula. 

Alabama has about 3 games where the opponent is a threat to beat them--they play 12 games, I believe.  To me, that is like having 9 preseason games. 

I can say that for the first time since I can remember, we are doing everything possible to win a championship. 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eagles went all out getting all these so called elite players. Look what happened to them that year when they literally fell flat on their faces literally and were destroyed and stopped dead in their tracks the whole season. I'm not saying the Falcons will fail but nobody knows who will falter this season.

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...