Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Bryce Young make the Pro Bowl next season?


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Am I not allowed to have an opinion?

 

Where was this energy when I was saying #SellOutForStroud...

 

Now that I jumped on the Young train im starting to notice a lot more people having a problem with me.

 

In case you didn't notice I don't have a favorite im fine with Stroud/AR if they are the pick as well. Im just saying if I had to make the pick im taking Young based on the tape. It's crazy you have to pick a side just to be cool on this sub.

 

 

This. Doesn't this apply to whole forum because that is what fans of a team do like bicker at each other and say dumb things just to get a rise out of others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already passed on Micah Parsons. Will Anderson would make our defense close to elite and if you remember anything from coaches first news conference, he wants a top five defense even before worrying about QB.

People choose not to hear that. Anderson is the guy to make that happen.

BPA he'll be a better player than Young, I stand on that statement. I looked at the stats and Tua was damn impressive, Matt Corral was impressive when contrasted and compared to Young.

If they don't want Stroud, Anderson is the safest pick. His impact will be instant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

We already passed on Micah Parsons. Will Anderson would make our defense close to elite and if you remember anything from coaches first news conference, he wants a top five defense even before worrying about QB.

People choose not to hear that. Anderson is the guy to make that happen.

BPA he'll be a better player than Young, I stand on that statement. I looked at the stats and Tua was damn impressive, Matt Corral was impressive when contrasted and compared to Young.

If they don't want Stroud, Anderson is the safest pick. His impact will be instant.

What has Dallas won since drafting Parsons and they have a halfway decent QB, damn sure a QB better than the 3 you named put together. 

Anderson is not on the board for us at 1. Corral is never going to play here, he might not even make the 53. Even if Young, Eason, Dalton all get hurt before preseason starts, they probably still sign another guy to start, thats how far down Corral is. They would take a 7th right now for him in all likelyhood. 

Our new QB, whoever it is will have an instant impact, much more so than a OLB who might have 10 sacks over 17 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

We already passed on Micah Parsons. Will Anderson would make our defense close to elite and if you remember anything from coaches first news conference, he wants a top five defense even before worrying about QB.

People choose not to hear that. Anderson is the guy to make that happen.

BPA he'll be a better player than Young, I stand on that statement. I looked at the stats and Tua was damn impressive, Matt Corral was impressive when contrasted and compared to Young.

If they don't want Stroud, Anderson is the safest pick. His impact will be instant.

Deal with it.

mighty mouse animation GIF

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

What has Dallas won since drafting Parsons and they have a halfway decent QB, damn sure a QB better than the 3 you named put together. 

Anderson is not on the board for us at 1. Corral is never going to play here, he might not even make the 53. Even if Young, Eason, Dalton all get hurt before preseason starts, they probably still sign another guy to start, thats how far down Corral is. They would take a 7th right now for him in all likelyhood. 

Our new QB, whoever it is will have an instant impact, much more so than a OLB who might have 10 sacks over 17 games. 

Well don't waste a pick on might mouse who may not make it through a season as the number 1 pick?! He's got the body of Barney Fife and you're going to put him ahead of specimens with NFL prototypical size, arm strength, rushing stats/ability?!

Leprechauns and rainbows, too many Lucky Charms up in here. Trying to be a voice of sanity 😉

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

We already passed on Micah Parsons. Will Anderson would make our defense close to elite and if you remember anything from coaches first news conference, he wants a top five defense even before worrying about QB.

People choose not to hear that. Anderson is the guy to make that happen.

BPA he'll be a better player than Young, I stand on that statement. I looked at the stats and Tua was damn impressive, Matt Corral was impressive when contrasted and compared to Young.

If they don't want Stroud, Anderson is the safest pick. His impact will be instant.

Holy guacamole 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

What has Dallas won since drafting Parsons and they have a halfway decent QB, damn sure a QB better than the 3 you named put together. 

Anderson is not on the board for us at 1. Corral is never going to play here, he might not even make the 53. Even if Young, Eason, Dalton all get hurt before preseason starts, they probably still sign another guy to start, thats how far down Corral is. They would take a 7th right now for him in all likelyhood. 

Our new QB, whoever it is will have an instant impact, much more so than a OLB who might have 10 sacks over 17 games. 

Lol. You think the problem in Dallas is the roster?! The players?!

No no no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...