Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

POLL: Have you accepted that Bryce Young will be a Panther yet, and are you excited?

Sean Payton's Vicodin
 Share

Have you accepted that Bryce Young will be a Panther yet, and are you excited about it?  

216 members have voted

  1. 1. topic

    • I am excited, and I have accepted it
      169
    • I am not excited, but I have concede that BY will be our QB
      28
    • I am still in denial and think he won't be the pick - THE BETTING SITES REMOVING THE PANTHERS PICK, THE REPORTS ETC ARE A MASSIVE SMOKESCREEN!!!
      19

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/27/2023 at 02:51 AM

Recommended Posts

FakePlasticTrees Enthusiast

FakePlasticTrees

Posted
Posted

I pray that the Panthers do  not make the colossal mistake of drafting Young as the obverall # 1 pick in the draft. Processing speed is not a magic elixir that will overcome hois hitorically small frame by NFL QB standards and relative pedestrian arm talent. He is not even particularly athletic and only plays in the shotgun, which is nightmare for established and consistent running games from the RB position.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
96Bravo Proficient

96Bravo

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, stan786 said:

Yeah the guy who constantly gets told he’s too small to play will never have a chip on his shoulder. Do you think Stroud gets enough blame for not beating Michigan and losing to Georgia?

You better freaking hope Young does have the chip you describe. I don't think he plays that way. I know Stroud does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
96Bravo Proficient

96Bravo

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, stan786 said:

That chip really helped as he got blown out by Michigan both years. Did you not watch Bryce play at all?

Dude, of course. You're really harping on those Michigan games. I feel bad for you...I really wish Young played better in the National Championship when he had the chance. Then you'd have a better argument.  Frankly, I'd feel better too if that was the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stan786 Mentor

stan786

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, 96Bravo said:

Dude, of course. You're really harping on those Michigan games. I feel bad for you...I really wish Young played better in the National Championship when he had the chance. Then you'd have a better argument.  Frankly, I'd feel better too if that was the case. 

Why would I not harp on two of the biggest games of his career? He didn’t win a Big 10 Championship because of that. Bryce won a Conference Championship and a Playoff game, neither thing Stroud can claim.

How do you give Stroud excuses you refuse to give Bryce? Bryce played out of his mind most that National Title game if you actually watched it. Lost his two top receivers and had them in it pretty late in the fourth.

Edited by stan786
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Then you are either a Bryce fan, or not paying attention. Hell, Young fans won't even admit he's short. 

You're wrong. Although kids like you never care that you're wrong.  You'll just throw more poo. 

I have zero problems with admitting none of these QB's are perfect, and none of them come close to the QB I'd create. 

That being said, whomever is drafted will get my full Panther Fandom support. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You're wrong. Although kids like you never care that you're wrong.  You'll just throw more poo. 

I have zero problems with admitting none of these QB's are perfect, and none of them come close to the QB I'd create. 

That being said, whomever is drafted will get my full Panther Fandom support. 

 

 

Wrong

 

Good for you

 

Once again, good for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...