Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2 - The Carolina Panthers Select Jonathan Mingo - WR - Mississippi


rodeo
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Trading up isn’t free lol. What they gave up to take a DE was stupid (and I think CJ will be a bust but that’s subjective) 

Both of those takes are bad. They’ve got so much draft capital why not trade up for the best defensive player in the draft. Better to have one stud than three jags. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Both of those takes are bad. They’ve got so much draft capital why not trade up for the best defensive player in the draft. Better to have one stud than three jags. 

In what world is the #12 pick (higher than Burns was drafted just saying) and a probable top 5 pick in 2024 jags? Now THATS a bad take 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Only to use one of them on a pass rusher.

 

So basically it's Burns for a 1st.

 

Good thing some of you dudes don't make these decisions. Premium pass rushers are the next most important position in football after the QB. You just don't get rid of elite pass rushers.

Did you just state the most obvious thing ever back at me and then go on a victory rant? Yes, of course we would’ve used one on a DE. That isn’t a breakthrough you just made man

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

So why trade Burns if we have to replace him at that same position with a player that most likely wont be as good as him?

 

That just doesn't make sense. Trading Burns only makes sense if we already have another DE who can replace his production on the roster.

 

It defeats the purpose of trading him. Understand now?

You can keep saying the same thing over and over again as much as you want. Yes you would need to replace Burns with a rookie DE or go buy one in FA. Yes you would have an extra first round pick (or 2 if you go FA). These are not new revelations. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Shi Smith and Damiere Byrd will be battling it out for a spot now.

Yeah, you got to think we carry 6 WRs max. I’m no particular order:

Thielen, Chark, Marshall, Shenault, Mingo, Byrd, Smith, Wright, Williams, Saunders.

The last 3 are probably gone but then you gotta decide between Bryd and Smith. 
 

Unless there is a plan to make Laviska a RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Damn I hadn't watched many highlights but Mingo has some wheels for 6'2" 220lbs. Hopefully he's AJ Brown/Deebo. I guess the foot injury hurt his stock. Seems very confident in his car interview thing

Yea he can move and is is going to be a yac machine. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Yea he can move and is is going to be a yac machine. 

Yeah looks like we're going quick strike yac offense with Chark over the top. Mingo can get out there too though, I forgot he was basically Corrals only weapon his last year at Ole Miss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In May of 2026, it looks like a challenging schedule...and it probably is.  I rarely listen to the "strength of schedule" conversations that light up social media this time of year. Each year teams improve and decline. I think there's chunks of the year we need to take care of business and the week 5 bye is not desired.  I do think if we don't hit the bye week at 3-1, it's going to be a major uphill battle given the schedule in front of us. This season falls on three people, regardless of schedule strength: Canales, Bryce, Evero.  Canales: Finally can truly coach all aspects of the team and not focus with gameday prep for OC duties anymore. He drives the bus and needs to get these guys in position to win each week. There's no way vets come in and put it on the line every week to watch our QB sh!t the bed (See: SF game last year). Bryce: Despite everyone's obsession with thinking Bryce is a guaranteed extension, I think this year will truly be his "prove it" year. If he comes out the way he has the past three years, I really don't see how vets and coaches can continue to put him under center long-term. He might play out that fifth year as the starter, but I think next offseason his long-term replacement is found. I also think there's no excuses with the weapons and commitment we've made on offense to insulate him with every possible weapon.  Evero: Best personnel he's had since he's been here...no excuses. Figure out how to blitz effectively. Figure out how to use CBs whose strengths are press/man. Figure out how to utilize a talented front-7 to get the hell of the field. Outside of FS and maybe....maybe ILB, there are few weaknesses on this unit. 
    • Canales can never get his teams ready in the first week of the season so far. Hope that changes or Ben Johnson is going to take his azz to school. 
×
×
  • Create New...