Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Rookie of the Year Odds


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Apparently they think Bijan Robinson is HOF material 

Odds to Win 2023 NFL OROY

Player Pos Team Odds to win 2023 NFL OROY
Bijan Robinson RB Falcons +300
Bryce Young QB Panthers +475
CJ Stroud QB Texans +700
Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR Seahawks +700
Jahmyr Gibbs RB Lions +900
Anthony Richardson QB Colts +900
Jordan Addison WR Vikings +1700
Zay Flowers WR Ravens +1800
Hendon Hooker QB Lions +2000
Zach Charbonnet RB Seahawks +2000
Quentin Johnston WR Chargers +2000
Will Levis QB Titans +2500
Jaylin Hyatt WR Giants +2500
Josh Downs WR Colts +2500
Tyjae Spears RB Titans +3000
Devon Achane RB Dolphins +3500
Tank Bigsby RB Jaguars +3500
Cedric Tillman WR Browns +3500
Dalton Kincaid TE Bills +3500
Rashee Rice WR Chiefs +3500

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

ATL doesn't have a proven qb so I would expect bijan to receive plenty of touches throughout the season which would inflate his stats

I'd expect everyone to stuff the run and force ridder to throw the ball. I don't think us focusing on D-line run guys is a coincidence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Somebody’s gonna have to explain Hendon Hooker getting better odds than literally anybody. Last I saw he’s out until at least December.

Supposed to be cleared by week 1, but even then, he's not likely to play this year unless Goff gets hurt.

But if Goff were to go down (or suck) and they play Hooker, he has the potential to put up goods stats with the weapons in that offense.  Purdy only played 6 games last year and was a ROY finalist, not likely to replicate that again, but if anyone could, it would be a QB with Hooker's ability.

Now, him having better odds than Levis, that I don't understand.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Supposed to be cleared by week 1, but even then, he's not likely to play this year unless Goff gets hurt.

But if Goff were to go down (or suck) and they play Hooker, he has the potential to put up goods stats with the weapons in that offense.  Purdy only played 6 games last year and was a ROY finalist, not likely to replicate that again, but if anyone could, it would be a QB with Hooker's ability.

Now, him having better odds than Levis, that I don't understand.

Ok yeah I probably should have googled first. I thought he would be out a lot longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm impressed with the way Tillis is structuring the books. The team is currently spending more on non-premium positions like iOL and S, but that’s because they’ve got rookie deals locked in at several key premium spots: QB: Bryce Young LT: Ikem Ekwonu EDGE: Nic Scourton, Princely Umanmielen WR: Tetairoa McMillan, Xavier Legette, Jalen Coker The only veterans at those premium positions on second contracts are Taylor Moton, Adam Thielen, and the recently extended Jaycee Horn. Given that setup, it makes sense to allocate bigger dollars toward non-premium roles - especially if those pieces support the development and success of the younger core. Investing in iOL helps our young QB. Strengthening the DL helps both of our young EDGE guys and our high-paid CB. I can see the vision. Fingers crossed that it works!
    • I don’t know why the tanking concept is not understood. Coaches and players are not involved at all. It’s always the front office. If we had actually traded players like we should have back in 2022, we would have effectively tanked and gotten a better pick than 9 so we lost all the draft picks to get Young. We traded CMC. We should have traded Burns for the haul and taken GB’s offer of a 1st for Moore. We could have easily traded anyone else. We see it in every sport, every year. Trade deadlines where bad teams give up current assets for future assets. Unfortunately, we were stupid and decided we only wanted to trade CMC for peanuts even though we clearly had a plan to go after Young. We were dumb and there is no way you can tell me that we shouldn’t have tanked via trading away Burns, Moore and anyone else. We’d be a much better team right now had we had a fire sale and tanked the 2022 season. Trading away your top players for future draft picks or prospects (baseball) is tanking. Shoeless Joe and the black Sox is not tanking. That’s point shaving/betting on your sport/team. Again, I just don’t get why this concept is so hard to get when MLB, NFL and NBA teams trade players for future assets every single year and usually end up with better draft slots (or at least odds since Hornets never win the lottery).
×
×
  • Create New...