Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more BOA


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

Sponsor names on stadiums?  I'm fine with it.

Sponsor names on player gameday jerseys?  Not so much.

Or players and coaches having to namedrop 100 different companies in there interviews like Nascar 

And Bryce Young putting on a Pepsi cap and drinking a mountain dew while being interviewed 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Or players and coaches having to namedrop 100 different companies in there interviews like Nascar 

And Bryce Young putting on a Pepsi cap and drinking a mountain dew while being interviewed 

 

 

 

 

NASCAR is designed for sponsors. I get that.

I am referring to more like the ALLY or AMERICAN INSURANCE team jerseys for soccer. Not a fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KushMcDieselson said:

BMW wouldn't be a terrible choice as I believe I read somewhere that the blue color in their logo is a also variation of the pantone process blue the the Panthers use.

Plus it’s the vehicle of choice for the wine and cheese portion of the fan base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2023 at 1:22 PM, BrisbanePanther said:

Whatever it is, I suspect there will be some tea leaves to read regarding timing of a new stadium, which would fetch huge dollars by itself. Also have to keep in mind that there'll be other stadiums coming too which could take some potential sponsors, including new ones in Buffalo, Nashville, and DC (which will almost certainly have their pick of sponsors in a mega-deal to compete with Bezos). In fact, I think a new DC stadium could break the $500m sponsorship mark.

That being said, my contenders would be:

American Airlines Field due to the Charlotte hub, but I'm not sure airlines are throwing money like this at sponsorships anymore.

I also think it could be a random one like:

Samsung Stadium--but then again this feels like the name for a new (or heavily renovated) stadium. The tech upgrades, customer experience, and product placement takes care of itself. All the video boards, ribbon boards, monitors, wifi, everything--all Samsung and probably special features for Samsung phone owners (like me! 👍). 

You can do the Samsung thing without it being the name of the stadium.  There are lots of partnership opportunities associated with a team.  The Ford's own the Detroit Lions and the stadium is Ford Field.  The Cowboys practice facility is sponsored by Ford.  Arrowhead stadium has a Ford Fan Zone and ford Tailgate District.

 

 

 

About-FF-CP-FF-68775a834a.jpg

ford-center-star (1).jpg

1e139226bfb54cb4a95cb9d5d179189c.jpg

Shutterstock_10033566p.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2023 at 10:49 PM, PanthersATL said:

Most likely to be a Carolina-based business, if I had to guess.
 

Mercedes shifted their naming rights to Atlanta from NO when they put their N.A. HQ down the street. I could see BMW picking this up because of their SC presence along with some competition.  Could also see Hyundai looking at a large marketing opportunity (Kia and Hyundai do a lot of sports marketing, and sponsorship rights don’t come up often)

Pepsi would be interesting, but am unsure if that would conflict with any NFL contractual obligations with Coca-Cola. Big picture is I’d doubt it would be a consumer retail/store product company. That would be “no” to Bojangles too.

Lowes would be interesting too, but they might be more interested in sponsoring a side project, like the Home Depot Backyard area at MB Stadium.

Insurance company, maybe. Geico?

Truist might make a play for it too.  Keep it in the Banking area.  Doubtful Amazon, Apple, Meta, or Google would spend money here as they’re not really looking to build awareness.

oooh, why not go back old school to memories of Ericsson?  T-Mobile likes arenas, why not do a stadium? Have to figure out how the magenta would work with Panther Blue though.

Uh BMW has a giant plant in Greenville SC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No matter what we still need a QB2 with potential to be a QB1. Keep throwing QBs at the wall until we find someone who sticks.
    • Lot of different agendas dictating opinions.  I don’t think it was the best use of money with Hunt, specifically, but the concept of OL, I am a fan. I didn’t complain a ton because I am a believer in winning up front, on both sides of the ball. I’d rather have stout fronts than fancy WRs. I have complained some about Hunt not being worth his deal, after seeing him get pushed around in a game or two. It’s no crusade. And have complained in the context of shorting the defense.   They have leveled out the FA imbalance with the dual big signings this offseason, and it has always been the draft picks I am most protective of. Anyway The picks are the real imbalance. If you did a trade chart value of the picks we directly gave up for Bryce, and added the support picks invested for skill players, and put that on one side… then put the little 3 3rd rounders and a 2nd that the defense got over three years on the other it would be hugely out of balance. I just want the balance restored. Defense is still owed.    
    • I'm one of the ones that won't let it go because it didn't solve the problem. We didn't address the center position which was a huge mistake. We were in position to easily take 2 or the top IOL. Instead of drafting JPJ over XL or Frazier over Brooks, we relied on an oft injured guard to center conversion and lo and behold, it failed as predicted. XL looks like a 1 year college wonder and an injured Brooks hasn't even surpassed Eric Shelton.  Bryce was also benched for poor performance, so the issue that many claimed was solely bad oline play wasn't. It didn't fix him bailing out of tight pockets because of being unable to see the field or him refusing to work on his atrocious footwork. Then there's the $$$. Lewis got a good guard payday. Hunt got a tackle payday. Pay tackles, draft guards, if you can.  I have no issues addressing problems through FA. It was not addressing C at all that's been the issue and still has been. Ryan Kalil was the anchor of our offensive line. We had years of solid center play and it showed. Now we're still piecemealing the center position with an expensive oline and it's still a shitshow. Why? Because the player responsible for what happens on the line presnap has little to no experience doing it. We did acquire a FA center this year finally. We'll see how much that impacts the line.  Spending on a center, whether it be through draft or FA is not bad. It's not a position that can have anyone just thrown in with no drop off in performance. A great center lifts the play of the guards on each side.  I don't like how we've built the line because we've ignored the hinge pin that everyone counts on every play. And the reality of the situation is, it didn't solve the actual problems with Bryce because those have nothing to do with the oline. 
×
×
  • Create New...