Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bear's side of getting Moore


Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Lol... Not with Justin Fields throwing him the ball.  His career is, sadly, over.

We shall see.  The thing is nobody knows until DJ gets some games in with Fields.  If fact, you don't really know what you will get from Bryce Young until he gets in some games.  He might be good or a BUST. Either way, it will be fun playing Carolina in Chicago this November.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bearzzz said:

We shall see.  The thing is nobody knows until DJ gets some games in with Fields.  If fact, you don't really know what you will get from Bryce Young until he gets in some games.  He might be good or a BUST. Either way, it will be fun playing Carolina in Chicago this November.

We all know exactly what we've got with Justin Fields... a QB who can't put together 150 passing yards a game.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

We all know exactly what we've got with Justin Fields... a QB who can't put together 150 passing yards a game.  

We will all see, won't we?  Keep in mind, they had the option to take any of the rookie QBs this year and still went with the QB that couldn't throw for 150 yards. But I am sure you know better than the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, in order to be a true dual threat, Fields will need drastic improvement as a passer. (“We’re not called dual threats because we can run it and not throw it,” said Griffin.)

Fields has had one of the worst statistical starts of any quarterback, and the Bears didn’t win another game after that October Monday night in New England. That stretch included record-setting performances from Fields, but the offense struggled to finish games in the fourth quarter, often because of errors by a below-average receiving group, protection issues and, at times, Fields’ inability to make the clutch throw.

Some of the pre-draft concerns have borne out: the speed at which he goes through his progressions, pocket presence, ball security and sack rate. He has made big plays with his arm, but not consistently enough.

Thirty-one quarterbacks have started at least 20 games in their first two seasons over the past decade, dating to the implementation of the rookie wage scale. Fields doesn’t stack up well, though he’s easily one of the best runners of the group.

On the record, opposing coaches and players lauded Fields throughout last season. But there are still questions around the league about his ceiling, and it’s not difficult to find naysayers.

“He struggles when the bullets are flying,” said one scout, who, like others in this article, was granted anonymity because he was not authorized by his team to speak.

“Everyone knows Fields has the ability,” another scout said. “He has to improve his decision-making.”

“Fields is like a Magic 8 Ball,” another scout said. “You don’t know what you’re going to get.”

One opposing assistant coach on the defensive side of the ball observed that Fields is best when there is space on the field and he can throw to a spot, like with deep crossing routes. Some intermediate routes — comebacks or digs that require precise timing and rhythm — are where he lags, the coach said.

The Bears were 32nd in the league in passing last season 

But if Fields is going to continue to run, his durability will be a concern. He suffered cracked ribs during his rookie season, separated his shoulder in Week 11 last year, then missed the season finale with a hip injury.

https://theathletic.com/4532858/2023/05/22/justin-fields-bears-offseason/

Needs to improve decision making.--where have we heard that one before?

Good luck DJ.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Varking said:

That’s a lot of give or take yards. Be bold in your prediction. Is it 800, 900 or 1k? 

I'll go 937 with 5 tds if that makes you happy. Yards are gargabe anyway...... Lmk when he scores double digit tds. 

It would not shock me to see him as low as 700 yards and 2-3 tds

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Allen got Diggs who was a top 10 #1 wr at the time. 

Fields is getting Moore, a top 10 #2 WR. 

It's not the same. 

Thank you Cpt. Obvious! I am not saying that Moore is Diggs. What I am saying is people don't need to write off Fields because he finally has NFL players at skill positions as opposed to absolutely nothing. When Josh Allen had no talent around him, he was throwing across his body to his FB for interceptions on 3rd and 12. Amazing what a new OC and some talent at the skills positions did for him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Of course, in order to be a true dual threat, Fields will need drastic improvement as a passer. (“We’re not called dual threats because we can run it and not throw it,” said Griffin.)

Fields has had one of the worst statistical starts of any quarterback, and the Bears didn’t win another game after that October Monday night in New England. That stretch included record-setting performances from Fields, but the offense struggled to finish games in the fourth quarter, often because of errors by a below-average receiving group, protection issues and, at times, Fields’ inability to make the clutch throw.

Some of the pre-draft concerns have borne out: the speed at which he goes through his progressions, pocket presence, ball security and sack rate. He has made big plays with his arm, but not consistently enough.

Thirty-one quarterbacks have started at least 20 games in their first two seasons over the past decade, dating to the implementation of the rookie wage scale. Fields doesn’t stack up well, though he’s easily one of the best runners of the group.

On the record, opposing coaches and players lauded Fields throughout last season. But there are still questions around the league about his ceiling, and it’s not difficult to find naysayers.

“He struggles when the bullets are flying,” said one scout, who, like others in this article, was granted anonymity because he was not authorized by his team to speak.

“Everyone knows Fields has the ability,” another scout said. “He has to improve his decision-making.”

“Fields is like a Magic 8 Ball,” another scout said. “You don’t know what you’re going to get.”

One opposing assistant coach on the defensive side of the ball observed that Fields is best when there is space on the field and he can throw to a spot, like with deep crossing routes. Some intermediate routes — comebacks or digs that require precise timing and rhythm — are where he lags, the coach said.

The Bears were 32nd in the league in passing last season 

But if Fields is going to continue to run, his durability will be a concern. He suffered cracked ribs during his rookie season, separated his shoulder in Week 11 last year, then missed the season finale with a hip injury.

https://theathletic.com/4532858/2023/05/22/justin-fields-bears-offseason/

Needs to improve decision making.--where have we heard that one before?

Good luck DJ.

I’d argue decision making already improved and should continue. He found out his line and his receivers were trash so he had to run a ton last year. And he increased completion rate, TDS passing and cut down on interception rate in year 2 as basically a rookie with a new head coach and new offensive coordinator with minimal talent around him year 2. This is the first year we should have a real read on Justin Fields. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

I'll go 937 with 5 tds if that makes you happy. Yards are gargabe anyway...... Lmk when he scores double digit tds. 

It would not shock me to see him as low as 700 yards and 2-3 tds

 

Does the QB have any bearing at all on these numbers? Or is it all on DJ? Asking for a friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

I’d argue decision making already improved and should continue. He found out his line and his receivers were trash so he had to run a ton last year. And he increased completion rate, TDS passing and cut down on interception rate in year 2 as basically a rookie with a new head coach and new offensive coordinator with minimal talent around him year 2. This is the first year we should have a real read on Justin Fields. 

 

As a Lions fan, I am willing to let Justin take all the time he needs to learn the position. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...