Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The kind of thing I muse about at this point in the offseason.


Recommended Posts

Over 20 years ago, a friend gave me this book about criminal behavior in the NFL;

Pros and Cons: The Criminals Who Play in the NFL: Benedict, Jeff, Yaeger, Don: 9780446524032: Amazon.com: Books

It was an eye opener. It was well researched and fairly presented. One of the underlying points of the book was about how organizations enabled awful behavior by excusing it. The authors talked about whenever you saw a head coach and a gm at a press conference about some awful thing a player or even coach had done, the phrase was always used that "everybody deserves a second chance, we all make mistakes." But what the research showed was that by the time this was being said publicly about an NFL player, it was almost never their second chance.

It was their ninth, or tenth, or whatever.

The thinking at the time seemed to be that we have so much invested in these players that we have to try to cover for them to protect that investment and keep them playing. I think that was the thinking in the NFL and pro sports in general for a long long time.

But somewhere along the way, NFL teams thinking on this started to evolve imo. Maybe it was forced to because too many players just kept getting into trouble and becoming huge distractions and disruptions, who knows. But there definitely seemed to be a fundamental attitude shift amongst braintrusts that scouting character before drafting or signing a player was as important scouting their on field abilities. Remember when it started to become commonplace when watching draft coverage to hear about such and such a player sliding down because of character concerns?

This started to hit NFL players and prospects that got out of line where it hurt: pocketbooks and prestige. Guys who on talent alone might have been first round picks or second round picks began to slide down by whole rounds of the draft over concerns about their ability to stay out of trouble. Veteran players started facing serious consequences from the league for bad behavior, including hefty fines and suspensions.

Unscientifically, when you look around the league, I think most people who are old enough to remember the NFL 20 years ago would agree that there just seems to be less of this thing of players constantly getting into legal trouble. Drunk driving, SO or child abuse, drug involvement, arrests for insane levels of speeding or reckless driving, all of that nonsense seems to be on long term decline. When I look around the league today, I mostly see professionals increasingly conducting themselves in a professional manner. I don't see nearly as much hooligan behavior.

Anyone who remembers the earliest days of the Panthers remembers Kerry Collins stupid smirk leaving the courthouse after his DUI, but we all also know that eventually he got his act together and matured into a veteran leader. I know that before they ever step in front of a mic at a press conference, most NFL players enter the league a lot more media savy than days gone by. While he obviously appears to be an exceptional young man in many respects, it's refreshing to me that the needle seems to be pointing a lot closer to guys like Bryce Young as typical than guys like that young Kerry Collins.

There's not a lot of X's and O's to discuss this time of year, so I figured I'd share my thoughts and this and see what others think about this sort of thing.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot more money on the line for prospects and players these days as well. I also think organizations grew weary of playing babysitter for guys as it became a huge drain on energy and resources. This is an example from the NBA, but I will never understand guys like Miles Bridges and Ja Morant behaving in the manner they did with a huge second contract on the line. It is idiotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

There is a lot more money on the line for prospects and players these days as well. I also think organizations grew weary of playing babysitter for guys as it became a huge drain on energy and resources. This is an example from the NBA, but I will never understand guys like Miles Bridges and Ja Morant behaving in the manner they did with a huge second contract on the line. It is idiotic.

I have a longtime friend who is a paramedic and one of his favorite sayings is "There is no IQ test to be a criminal." I think changes the incentives and disincentives have had a strong positive overall impact on player behavior, but no matter what you do, you're always going to have a minimal baseline level of knucklehead nonsense from guys who just can't figure it out or get out of their own way.

No matter what the league did about player safety, Vontaze Burfict continued to be athletically gifted human garbage long after most guys had accepted the new paradigm. Thankfully that situation resolved itself and he's no longer in the league. The funny thing is, to me all signs point to the new way of doing things as a win for just about everybody but the Burficts and Morants of the world. 

I'm not sure how I might have turned out had I been handed millions of dollars in pay and a high degree of public recognition and adulation at an age where I could barely drink legally, but if I'd been surrounded by a lot of grown men covering for me and making excuses to the world every time I did something boneheaded, I suspect it's entirely possible things might have gone downhill fast. Switching from that to an environment of more personal accountability I suspect has lead to better outcomes for players, teams, and fans who got tired of the nonsense.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you played at a viciously competitive high school, or at any college level...you see the enabling start at very young ages...especially to those with talent.

Once you are playing D1...it goes to another level all together, and certainly with starters.  I lived with a player (non starter) of a big D1 school in college (off campus), and hung out with a lot of players (starters)....these guys could get away with damn near anything short of murder.  This was in the early 00's...I think a lot of that has been cleaned up now, or it seems to be from the outside looking in.

If you are old enough to remember the NFL of the 80's, to look back at that era, and compare it to today....it's a different game/feel completely.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

If you played at a viciously competitive high school, or at any college level...you see the enabling start at very young ages...especially to those with talent.

A lot of truth to this and honestly it's only gotten exponentially worse with the rise of AAU ball and what basically amounts to diploma mill high schools that focus on developing these kids primarily as athletes first to get them D1 scholarships and hopefully provide a pathway to professional sports. But the really is that most 4 and 5 star recruits still won't ultimately play professional sports.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard of that book. Haven't read it but it's supposed to be a good one.

I'd add that one of the things which probably helped change the culture was the rise of the internet and social media. It's way harder to cover things up these days than it used to be.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2023 at 8:56 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

A lot of truth to this and honestly it's only gotten exponentially worse with the rise of AAU ball and what basically amounts to diploma mill high schools that focus on developing these kids primarily as athletes first to get them D1 scholarships and hopefully provide a pathway to professional sports. But the really is that most 4 and 5 star recruits still won't ultimately play professional sports.

That's something that was true in the 90's and early 2000's. AAU isn't rife with that anymore. It exists but a smaller percentage. 

TBH, AAU ball is much better prep for college than high school basketball. HS basketball is just about useless for most kids. 

A lot of that comes from former(and current) college and pro athletes having big AAU programs. They know what it takes to make successful athletes. Far more so than a lot of the shady characters that were around the AAU(and HS) scene back in the day.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's something that was true in the 90's and early 2000's. AAU isn't rife with that anymore. It exists but a smaller percentage. 

TBH, AAU ball is much better prep for college than high school basketball. HS basketball is just about useless for most kids. 

A lot of that comes from former(and current) college and pro athletes having big AAU programs. They know what it takes to make successful athletes. Far more so than a lot of the shady characters that were around the AAU(and HS) scene back in the day.

I don't think you were understanding what I was saying. I'm saying the rise of AAU ball increases the amount of pandering and special treatment of these kids with elite talent. The individual teams and tournaments are falling over themselves trying to secure the best talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2023 at 7:23 AM, 1of10Charnatives said:

Over 20 years ago, a friend gave me this book about criminal behavior in the NFL;

Pros and Cons: The Criminals Who Play in the NFL: Benedict, Jeff, Yaeger, Don: 9780446524032: Amazon.com: Books

It was an eye opener. It was well researched and fairly presented. One of the underlying points of the book was about how organizations enabled awful behavior by excusing it. The authors talked about whenever you saw a head coach and a gm at a press conference about some awful thing a player or even coach had done, the phrase was always used that "everybody deserves a second chance, we all make mistakes." But what the research showed was that by the time this was being said publicly about an NFL player, it was almost never their second chance.

It was their ninth, or tenth, or whatever.

The thinking at the time seemed to be that we have so much invested in these players that we have to try to cover for them to protect that investment and keep them playing. I think that was the thinking in the NFL and pro sports in general for a long long time.

But somewhere along the way, NFL teams thinking on this started to evolve imo. Maybe it was forced to because too many players just kept getting into trouble and becoming huge distractions and disruptions, who knows. But there definitely seemed to be a fundamental attitude shift amongst braintrusts that scouting character before drafting or signing a player was as important scouting their on field abilities. Remember when it started to become commonplace when watching draft coverage to hear about such and such a player sliding down because of character concerns?

This started to hit NFL players and prospects that got out of line where it hurt: pocketbooks and prestige. Guys who on talent alone might have been first round picks or second round picks began to slide down by whole rounds of the draft over concerns about their ability to stay out of trouble. Veteran players started facing serious consequences from the league for bad behavior, including hefty fines and suspensions.

Unscientifically, when you look around the league, I think most people who are old enough to remember the NFL 20 years ago would agree that there just seems to be less of this thing of players constantly getting into legal trouble. Drunk driving, SO or child abuse, drug involvement, arrests for insane levels of speeding or reckless driving, all of that nonsense seems to be on long term decline. When I look around the league today, I mostly see professionals increasingly conducting themselves in a professional manner. I don't see nearly as much hooligan behavior.

Anyone who remembers the earliest days of the Panthers remembers Kerry Collins stupid smirk leaving the courthouse after his DUI, but we all also know that eventually he got his act together and matured into a veteran leader. I know that before they ever step in front of a mic at a press conference, most NFL players enter the league a lot more media savy than days gone by. While he obviously appears to be an exceptional young man in many respects, it's refreshing to me that the needle seems to be pointing a lot closer to guys like Bryce Young as typical than guys like that young Kerry Collins.

There's not a lot of X's and O's to discuss this time of year, so I figured I'd share my thoughts and this and see what others think about this sort of thing.

My step-dad used to party with Kerry Collins at Loafers on Albemarle Rd lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think you were understanding what I was saying. I'm saying the rise of AAU ball increases the amount of pandering and special treatment of these kids with elite talent. The individual teams and tournaments are falling over themselves trying to secure the best talent.

I would disagree in general. It isn't any worse than it was before. Also you definitely see a marked increase in focusing on the academic side because so many of those careers were hampered due to that kind of thing back in the day. 

I am telling you this from actual personal experience, BTW. I have been involved with and around AAU basketball for almost 25 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would disagree in general. It isn't any worse than it was before. Also you definitely see a marked increase in focusing on the academic side because so many of those careers were hampered due to that kind of thing back in the day. 

I am telling you this from actual personal experience, BTW. I have been involved with and around AAU basketball for almost 25 years.

I'll take your word for it but from the outside looking in it definitely doesn't see better maybe even more specifically on the youth side. When I was a kid it was ballers only. There weren't a whole lot of travel teams per area and the kids on those teams could PLAY. These days there's a spot available for anyone whose parents will write that check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll take your word for it but from the outside looking in it definitely doesn't see better maybe even more specifically on the youth side. When I was a kid it was ballers only. There weren't a whole lot of travel teams per area and the kids on those teams could PLAY. These days there's a spot available for anyone whose parents will write that check.

There is a difference between serious AAU and just teams that are made up of any Tom, Dick or Harry that will pay. At the younger levels, it's pay to play but in serious programs that starts to split off once they get towards being teenaged. By 14U to 16U(depends on the program) there are no more payments from parents for each event, it's all shoe sponsorship money that covers most of the expenses. 

Obviously the serious programs are dwarfed by the run of the mill programs but almost all of the best talent will end up on a serious, sponsored team. That's really the only way to build yourself as a serious scholarship level athlete. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...