Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor - Canes Adding Tarasenko


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, backINblack28 said:

yeah it looks like his old agent had a deal in place with us and then he fired them. back to square one, and considering that, i'd think that does not help our chances. course Orlov and he are best buds..

Agent may have thought he had a deal but Tarasenko didn’t see it that way for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

The Tarasenko Twitter Show just keeps getting better. This from a NY Post writer (covers the Rangers).

 

I read he could do a 1 year with the rags then revisit next year when the cap is suppose to go up by 4M. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

If we dont get Tarasenko, we better keep looking for someone else.

As long as it’s a scoring forward. Not a lot of big offensive line scorers in this offseason. And I don’t want to go try to get more scoring on defense that’s not our weakness.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Harbingers said:

I read he could do a 1 year with the rags then revisit next year when the cap is suppose to go up by 4M. 

Then does this, tears his ACL, and has to sign a 3 year 8 mill contract.

If he does this, it's definitely a ballsy move for a guy with a litany of injuries in his career

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

Who knows if this is real. Sportswriter supposedly but few followers. I think it bs but who knows.

 

 

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

Who knows if this is real. Sportswriter supposedly but few followers. I think it bs but who knows.

 

Obviously fake news Would have been out all over the place by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...