Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Huddle Fantasy Football League?


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ACobra289 said:

RE: Waiver wire pickups

I don't think it's been discussed, but I much prefer doing a FAAB system for the free agents versus the usual waiver wire. 

FAAB is a system where each team in your league is given a certain amount of "budget" to spend on free agents. Instead of being the first team to claim a free agent off the waiver wire, you bid on them with your budget. The highest bidder wins, and the winning bid is deducted from your budget. 

Usually $100 for the year.

 

That sounds like too much work. I like the waiver wire.  If your team sucks you should have first dubs if your team is 6-0 you shouldn't be able to just outbid someone for a breakout star when your team is already stacked 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, toldozer said:

That sounds like too much work. I like the waiver wire.  If your team sucks you should have first dubs if your team is 6-0 you shouldn't be able to just outbid someone for a breakout star when your team is already stacked 

Too much work? Uh okay.  Just a suggestion. Not a deal breaker for me. Unless you have the waiver wire set up to do an inverse of the standings, the worst team doesn't necessarily get first shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ACobra289 said:

Too much work? Uh okay.  Just a suggestion. Not a deal breaker for me. Unless you have the waiver wire set up to do an inverse of the standings, the worst team doesn't necessarily get first shot. 

I do have the wire to bet set up that way after week 3. before week 3 its inverse of draft order. if the majority is down ill do the budget but me personally id vote to just keep it as is.

 

also toldozer is paid we are 9/12 paid now.

Edited by DJ feed me moore
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

I do have the wire to bet set up that way after week 3. before week 3 its inverse of draft order. if the majority is down ill do the budget but me personally id vote to just keep it as is.

 

also toldozer is paid we are 9/12 paid now.

No worries, as is is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ACobra289 said:

Too much work? Uh okay.  Just a suggestion. Not a deal breaker for me. Unless you have the waiver wire set up to do an inverse of the standings, the worst team doesn't necessarily get first shot. 

I've always done inverse didn't know it was an option. It's interesting  just seems like too much for me haha

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2023 at 5:24 PM, toldozer said:

That sounds like too much work. I like the waiver wire.  If your team sucks you should have first dubs if your team is 6-0 you shouldn't be able to just outbid someone for a breakout star when your team is already stacked 

All depends on if you know how to use FAAB or not. You can spend it all early on a breakout player or wait for a guy to show up late in the season that pushes you over the edge. FAAB requires skill and strategy. I love FAAB.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2023 at 8:33 PM, DJ feed me moore said:

I do have the wire to bet set up that way after week 3. before week 3 its inverse of draft order. if the majority is down ill do the budget but me personally id vote to just keep it as is.

 

also toldozer is paid we are 9/12 paid now.

I vote for keep it as is

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Are we still planning on finding out draft positions 1 hour before the draft begins? Personally I prefer to know at least a little bit before the draft to do some type of preparation. 

I could do a randomizer on my own and post the results otherwise we would have to wait till 90 mins before.

4 hours ago, ladypanther said:

We get to 12 yet?

@carpanfan96 was added and has said he will pay on Thursday, the other two that didn't pay I removed because I have not heard from them, that leaves us at 11/12 spots so If anyone wants to join just send me a DM. $20

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NAS said:

Let’s just let it randomize 90 mins before. It will be more exciting 

yeah there's just no other way to truly do it. Also bumping because we need one more player to complete the league 

@shaq

@The Huddler

@Ocpanthertew714 

@anyone 

 

https://fantasy.espn.com/football/league?leagueId=1606484626

 

team 3 is the last open team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DJ feed me moore said:

yeah there's just no other way to truly do it. Also bumping because we need one more player to complete the league 

@shaq

@The Huddler

@Ocpanthertew714 

@anyone 

 

https://fantasy.espn.com/football/league?leagueId=1606484626

 

team 3 is the last open team. 

Sorry just found out I can’t do any sports wagering due to my new job. Im sure you will find someone, best of luck!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...