Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who impressed and who sucked - preseason game 1

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Guessing CJ @#2

That's a big positive people are overlooking.  DJ looked like he is 100% back from that injury.  That's an injury that can ruin careers because some players never get their speed back.  A healthy DJ and Horn could be a nice CB duo for us this year.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That's a big positive people are overlooking.  DJ looked like he is 100% back from that injury.  That's an injury that can ruin careers because some players never get their speed back.  A healthy DJ and Horn could be a nice CB duo for us this year.  

Any idea who #2 was? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bearzzz said:

We shall see. Just preseason.  But that Fields + Moore connection looking very nice right now.

Good for Moore. But the single pass from Fields to Moore in that game was a screen pass parallel to the los. So it is hard to say anything about their connection at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I believe it was CJ Henderson 

 

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It was Henderson

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/lists/panthers-jets-pff-grades-preseason-week-1/

 

Thanks brothers. But also… holy hell

 

29. LT Cameron Erving: 47.5
30. LT Larnel Coleman: 46.9
31. TE Hayden Hurst: 43.9
32. LT Ikem Ekwonu: 43.4
33. G Michael Jordan: 34.3

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Varking said:

 

Thanks brothers. But also… holy hell

 

29. LT Cameron Erving: 47.5
30. LT Larnel Coleman: 46.9
31. TE Hayden Hurst: 43.9
32. LT Ikem Ekwonu: 43.4
33. G Michael Jordan: 34.3

I'm hoping the Ickey score is mostly him being lazy and shaking rust off. Jordan I could have told you it was bad, he caused most of the pressures that Matt Corral saw as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Varking said:

 

Thanks brothers. But also… holy hell

 

29. LT Cameron Erving: 47.5
30. LT Larnel Coleman: 46.9
31. TE Hayden Hurst: 43.9
32. LT Ikem Ekwonu: 43.4
33. G Michael Jordan: 34.3

Jordan claiming his top spot.  We just need to cut him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted

I read the following:

"Bryce Young and Matt Corral were under constant duress. Whether it was the first team or the backups, nobody aside from perhaps starting left guard Brady Christensen can look back on their performance fondly."

Did Christensen suck less that the rest of the line? I wasn't able to watch the game Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

I read the following:

"Bryce Young and Matt Corral were under constant duress. Whether it was the first team or the backups, nobody aside from perhaps starting left guard Brady Christensen can look back on their performance fondly."

Did Christensen suck less that the rest of the line? I wasn't able to watch the game Saturday.

No, Christensen and Icky both got burned on stunts...as if they hadn't played  a season together last year.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bearzzz Enthusiast

Bearzzz

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Martin said:

Good for Moore. But the single pass from Fields to Moore in that game was a screen pass parallel to the los. So it is hard to say anything about their connection at this point.

Hence the "we shall see, just preseason" statement.  All reports from camp have been saying they have had very good chemistry.  Truth is, nobody knows how it will turn out, but I am liking what I am seeing & reports coming out of camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...